Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Nov 2006 07:25 In article <454B415B.F7D7DADA(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >So you choose to listen to somebody who isn't even running for office, >> >> Kerry? He's running for President. > >Is he ? Yes. Time will tell if his latest slip of foot-in-mouth disease will affect his campaign. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Nov 2006 07:27 In article <S8J2h.682$Mw.315(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote in message >news:1162566543.051602.226320(a)f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> >> It is likely that he will give it a try. This week's comments were a >> botched joke. We already knew that Kerry can't tell a joke to save his >> life so in the long run it won't matter. What will matter is that he >> has already lost one election and it is likely that the voters will >> never forgive him for that. >> >> In the US they have things called "primaries" where the folks from the >> same party run against each other for the right to run in the general >> election. Kerry is not likely to come in above 4th place in the >> primaries where three people are running. > >Good lord, I hope not. I've been telling that the Democrat leadership are insane. <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Nov 2006 07:30 In article <taI2h.502$Mw.5(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eifet5$8qk_006(a)s820.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <Gun2h.3654$B31.3169(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eicnua$8qk_009(a)s950.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> In article <691d6$4548e447$4fe7703$17646(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <8594c$45468e46$4fe716b$704(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In article <Lga1h.2227$s6.11(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, >>>>>>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>snip >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Nothing about annihilation of western civilization is amusing. >>>>>>>>>>>This is serious business and it will take another three massive >>>>>>>>>>>killings before the insane politicians are thrown out and >>>>>>>>>>>ones who are willing to deal with problem constructively are >>>>>>>>>>>put back in power. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Those who persist in denying the announced and obvious >>>>>>>>>>end up driving the defensive system towards an eventual >>>>>>>>>>dictatorial authority. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Hitler's Mein Kampf was not a secret. The agenda was >>>>>>>>>>mapped out in advance. Militant Islam has been advocating >>>>>>>>>>against the west for decades. Despite the protestations >>>>>>>>>>of some, it is a religion spread by violence and has been >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>from the day that Mohammed decided he was heading up a >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>new religion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>If we look at British conduct in the face of Hitler's >>>>>>>>>>growing menace, we see the same sorts of appeasement >>>>>>>>>>as is being promoted in these related threads. In the >>>>>>>>>>case of Britain, they eventually put Churchill in >>>>>>>>>>charge. He was one of those "last choice" sorts of >>>>>>>>>>men that the appeasers disdained. They historically >>>>>>>>>>worked hard to derail him but there came a moment >>>>>>>>>>of truth when they were finally unable to deny the >>>>>>>>>>realities facing them any longer, and needed a >>>>>>>>>>strong man to drive them towards victory. By that >>>>>>>>>>time they were in trouble, so America was pulled >>>>>>>>>>into the fray, with its own dictator style president >>>>>>>>>>at the helm replaced eventually (after death) by a >>>>>>>>>>sleeper sort of a strong man who didn't hesitate to >>>>>>>>>>use the atomic bomb to end the Pacific war. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>How many today would have the nerve to actually use a >>>>>>>>>>nuclear weapon? Certainly none of the appeasers here >>>>>>>>>>want that to happen, but by their actions they're >>>>>>>>>>driving the system towards the point where other >>>>>>>>>>options will cease to exist. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Unfortunately, with the sorts of "good human beings" >>>>>>>>>>we're encountering in this newsgroup, we'll probably >>>>>>>>>>evenually get to the point where we'll have to use >>>>>>>>>>our own final solution to the problem by using nukes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>History has taught us that it is a much smaller mess >>>>>>>>>>if you take care of business and protect yourself >>>>>>>>>>early in the game, rather than late. Keep on ignoring >>>>>>>>>>all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >>>>>>>>>>futures. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>BAH--this is a new low for you. Self-congratulation and attacking >>>>>>>>>other >>>>>>>>>posters by using another screen name. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Huh? I can't write that well. You will assume any posture just >>>>>>>>to avoid the facts of what is really going on. I don't know >>>>>>>>how to deal with this kind of insanity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>By making this sort of accuation he's avoiding >>>>>>>the issues. He didn't have a single point to >>>>>>>make about the content of the post. And if >>>>>>>one considers the content of his posting, it >>>>>>>actually has nothing at all to do with what's >>>>>>>above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If anyone deserves to be ignored, he does. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not a viable choice. When the US gets its Democrat for >>>>>> President, s/he/it will think, talk and act like Eric portrays >>>>>> in this discussion. That's the only reason I've stayed here so >>>>>> long. >>>>> >>>>>You mean like Kerry and his latest debacle? >>>> >>>> >>>> Exactly. I knew he didn't like to work. What was really >>>> weird is that the speech was so familiar; he'ld given a similar >>>> sentiment when he was running for an office in 1972. At least the >>>> news here reported that one. He's using his anti-Nam speeches. >>>> The Democrats are turning this election year into another Nam >>>> political tactic; so now I'm concentrating on reading about that >>>> era. >>> >>>So you choose to listen to somebody who isn't even running for office, >> >> Kerry? He's running for President. > >Funny, we're not electing a president next week. Focus. I'm not the one who has to focus. The Democrats are the ones who have to focus. That is what I'm saying in this thread. They are avoiding everything that has to do with reality. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Nov 2006 07:30 In article <ZN2dnbrj16oQotbYRVnyhw(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:ei22el$8ss_006(a)s765.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <VjT0h.22840$e66.20121(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:45436FD6.3B0A4C75(a)hotmail.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Wow. You should market your filter. I know a few politicians >>>>> that would love to hand them out before every speech. >>>> >>>> Do you have anything useful to contribute ? >>> >>>Apparently she doesn't. Logic has failed her, so she just goes around >>>spouting Republican soundbites and acting holier-than-thou when people >>>dare >>>to question them. >> >> I seem to be making my points; I can tell when you start using >> circular logic to refute them. > >Was that circular logic? Nope. Merely a comment on a very odd behaviour I've been observing. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Nov 2006 07:32
In article <454B7E29.47B9698C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >and much of that in older >> >homes that can benefit from improved insulation, if the economic benefit is >> >there. The rest is domestically supplied--either natural gas or already >> >electric. Add to this the fact that much of the oil home heating will be >> >taken up by natural gas, since it is much cheaper in most markets. And add >> >to this the fact that it is in the summer, not the winter, that the electric >> >grid is stretched to anywhere near its limit. >> >> No, it's not. Ours is stretched in the winter too. If everybody >> goes to electric heating, there will black outs during the winter. > >Do you guys not have fireplaces any more ? Only for show. Are you saying that it's OK to pollute the air for heating? /BAH |