From: Hans-Peter Diettrich on
Helmut Hullen schrieb:

> Sidney is one of the well known trolls at least in
> "alt.os.linux.slackware".
>
> You shouldn't feed it.

I'm only a mouse that performs complex experiments on humans ;-)

Normalerweise klicke ich ihn ungelesen weg, aber manchmal kommen
interessante (psychologische) Beitr�ge von anderen, und da kann ich
nicht widerstehen...

DoDi
From: John Hasler on
Aragorn writes:
> ...you mentioned Sid in one breath with Ted Bundy and Adolf Hitler.

No, _I_ didn't.

> Adolf Hitler was a monster and should not even be called human
> anymore.

Adolf Hitler differed from a large fraction of the human race only in
that he was in the right place at the right time to actually realize a
substantial part of his dreams. He was very, very human (as were the
millions who assisted him). Calling him an inhuman monster is denial.
Calling him a politician, on the other hand, is a simple statement of
fact.

> Sid on the other hand is just a loser with an attitude to cover up for
> the fact that he's a zillion times more stupid than he thinks he is.

Sid is just an ordinary netkook. Why do you waste your time insulting
him?
--
John Hasler
jhasler(a)newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
From: Aragorn on
On Thursday 08 October 2009 00:07 in comp.os.linux.misc, somebody
identifying as Aragorn wrote...

> [...] I would still oppose the execution of Adolf Hitler as the
> consequence of a trial in which he is found guilty. However, I would
> have opposed the assassination of Adolf Hitler [...]
^^^^
Should be "not have opposed", of course.

--
*Aragorn*
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
From: Aragorn on
On Thursday 08 October 2009 00:08 in comp.os.linux.misc, somebody
identifying as John Hasler wrote...

> Aragorn writes:
>
>> ...you mentioned Sid in one breath with Ted Bundy and Adolf Hitler.
>
> No, _I_ didn't.

Yes yes, there was some confusion on my part, and that has already been
cleared up.

>> Adolf Hitler was a monster and should not even be called human
>> anymore.
>
> Adolf Hitler differed from a large fraction of the human race only in
> that he was in the right place at the right time to actually realize a
> substantial part of his dreams. He was very, very human (as were the
> millions who assisted him).

For some values of "human".

> Calling him an inhuman monster is denial.
> Calling him a politician, on the other hand, is a simple statement of
> fact.

It is not denial. Politician or not, a man who decides that six million
Jews must all be exterminated and then actually puts this into
realization is a monster.

>> Sid on the other hand is just a loser with an attitude to cover up
>> for the fact that he's a zillion times more stupid than he thinks he
>> is.
>
> Sid is just an ordinary netkook. Why do you waste your time insulting
> him?

I'm not insulting him. I am stating an analysis, which I myself find to
be quite accurate.

--
*Aragorn*
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
From: Chris F.A. Johnson on
On 2009-10-07, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> Aragorn writes:
>>> Under restraint, in an isolation cell? What harm can they do there?
>>> :-)
>>
>> I wrote:
>>> What could they do there at all except consume resources and suffer?
>>
>> Aragorn writes:
>>> They could become One with the Truth and realize the wrongness of
>>> their commitment to the Dark Side, Paddawan. :-)
>>
>> Much like the 19th century practice of locking criminals (often
>> illiterate ones) in solitary confinement with a Bible. Many went mad.
>
> a very sane response to such an environment, as RD Laing might have said.

Indeed, the bible is dangerous!

--
Chris F.A. Johnson, author | <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
Shell Scripting Recipes: | My code in this post, if any,
A Problem-Solution Approach | is released under the
2005, Apress | GNU General Public Licence