New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 13 Aug 2006 17:03 On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <io8td2let3pkot582eop7of01rb2f2gj48(a)4ax.com>, >Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote: >>On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:40:02 GMT, joseph2k <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> >>Gave us: >> >>>reply interstitial >> >> Top posting Usenet retard! > >You will notice that his reply is not top posted just like he said. You >were looking at his posting and still managed to get it wrong. > Actually, I didn't read past the first line, and didn't even read what that line said. So it is you that got something wrong as well, netkopp asswipe. (likely take you years to get that one) Fact is, there is no need to announce your posting style. Sort of retarded, actually.
From: Phat Bytestard on 13 Aug 2006 17:08 On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us: >In article <or6td2l1ns341lon8jm367b2og4ellj361(a)4ax.com>, >Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote: >>On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:16:17 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net >>(Ken Smith) Gave us: >> >>>The dirt starts eating up your signal before you get to a GHz. >> >> That must be why nothing passes through your head. > >Oh, what an amazing technical comment! My my, how it hurts me so much to >be insulted by Phat again. > >At least you didn't claim that GPR could see to the center of the earth. >This I see as some improvement. > You mean you never saw the movie "The Core"??? Bwuahahahahahahahah! (you won't likely get that one either).
From: Michael A. Terrell on 13 Aug 2006 17:09 John Woodgate wrote: > > In message <44DDE123.10B61CFF(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com>, dated Sat, 12 Aug > 2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> writes > >Selective use of 'scriptures' is what fundamentalists of all > >persuasions typically do to brainwash their followers. > > Exactly my point. The popes who blessed crusaders probably had that > verse in mind when doing so. > -- > OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk > 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. > > John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I'm not a Catholic, so the Popes have no meaning for me. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Michael A. Terrell on 13 Aug 2006 17:10 Eeyore wrote: > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > I was just trying to figure out why John chose one verse out of > > context. > > Selective use of 'scriptures' is what fundamentalists of all persuasions > typically do to brainwash their followers. > > Graham I wouldn't know. I was taught that if you are going to study the Bible you are to study the entire Bible, not take parts of it out of context. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 13 Aug 2006 17:17
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > > > I was just trying to figure out why John chose one verse out of > > > context. > > > > Selective use of 'scriptures' is what fundamentalists of all persuasions > > typically do to brainwash their followers. > > > > Graham > > I wouldn't know. I was taught that if you are going to study the > Bible you are to study the entire Bible, not take parts of it out of > context. I'm pleased to hear that. Graham |