From: Eeyore on


Jim Yanik wrote:

> David Brown <david(a)westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote in
> news:44e03429$1(a)news.wineasy.se:
>
> > Eeyore wrote:
> >>
> >> Jim Yanik wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey,Iran is clever;they use Lebanon and Gaza as their
> >>> battlefields,Hezbollah and Hamas as their mercenaries,Syria as a
> >>> buffer. Iran itself hasn't risked much at all.
> >>
> >> Your point is ?
> >>
> >> Graham
>
> Way over YOUR head,Grammy.
>
> > Perhaps he means to say they are as bad as the Americans, who use the
> > Israeli military as mercenaries.
>
> Yes,due to our wussy liberal/Democrat/socialists,who are all to ready to
> sell out Israel,the US has not come down fully on Israel's side.
>
> As to using them as "mercenaries",I suppose you can cite an example of when
> and where the US has done this? (Paid them to fight for us.)

Well....... Israel gets nearly 3 bn annually from the USA. So that's the 'paid
for' bit settled.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


John Larkin wrote:

> All those US soldiers who died on Omaha Beach, liberating mainland
> Europe from the Nazis... do they meet your definition of mercenary?
> After all, they were fighting for a foreign country, based in another
> foreign country, and they were getting paid.

In what way were they fighting 'for a foreign country' ?

Graham

From: John Woodgate on
In message <rm21e252e1dn7uuqkm34d8ff4u3rtrvq70(a)4ax.com>, dated Mon, 14
Aug 2006, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
writes

>You probably have fewer lunatics in Norway, another reason your
>politics is dull. All your real nut cases emigrated here ages ago.

There goes the Minnesota vote!
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: bill.sloman on

Jim Yanik wrote:
> David Brown <david(a)westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote in
> news:44e039f5(a)news.wineasy.se:
>
> > John Larkin wrote:
> >> On 11 Aug 2006 04:46:30 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
> >>
> > > It's interesting how obsessed europeans seem to be with American
> >> politics. Since their function in the world is largely passive by
> >> choice, and since enormous messes remain of their direct making, I
> >> should think they'd be content to spend their days on holiday,
> >> wine-tasting or whatever they do for amusement.
> >>
> >> It's the fish-or-cut-bait thing.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >
> > American politics is far more entertaining than a lot of European
> > politics. Here in Norway, the government is formed by a coalition - it
> > doesn't really make a big difference who you vote for, because they all
> > get together to argue out a compromise afterwards. But on the other
> > side of the Atlantic, a half percent of votes stolen here or there makes
> > a huge difference to the country and the rest of the world. It's the
> > same with scandals - if our prime minister had an affair, people would
> > say it's between him and his wife, while a little indiscretion by your
> > previous president brought your country to a halt.
> >
>
> "stolen" votes?
>
> any credibility you had has evaporated.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

with you, perhaps.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:54:07 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>John Larkin wrote:
>
>> All those US soldiers who died on Omaha Beach, liberating mainland
>> Europe from the Nazis... do they meet your definition of mercenary?
>> After all, they were fighting for a foreign country, based in another
>> foreign country, and they were getting paid.
>
>In what way were they fighting 'for a foreign country' ?
>
>Graham

Yours, among others.

John