From: Ken Smith on
In article <s34vd254dd9ur9khrjt3pkdaks1q4jb64e(a)4ax.com>,
Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net
>(Ken Smith) Gave us:
>
>>Some others were made in 1959. You
>>were wrong about the year.
>
> ONE was made in 1959. It was the development device.
>
> MASS production, what we like to call MANUFACTURING began in 1960.

That isn't what you said. Was it?


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Ken Smith on
In article <1p4vd2tpcdrigj85rkapst96jifvlndren(a)4ax.com>,
Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net
>(Ken Smith) Gave us:
>
>>In article <io8td2let3pkot582eop7of01rb2f2gj48(a)4ax.com>,
>>Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:40:02 GMT, joseph2k <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com>
>>>Gave us:
>>>
>>>>reply interstitial
>>>
>>> Top posting Usenet retard!
>>
>>You will notice that his reply is not top posted just like he said. You
>>were looking at his posting and still managed to get it wrong.
>>
> Actually, I didn't read past the first line, and didn't even read
>what that line said.

Notice that I said "looking at". I didn't say "read". I admit that I
assumed that you took your input from the news group in visual form and
not via braille. You have in the past used words like "saw" in ways that
leads me to believe that you have eyesight.


> So it is you that got something wrong as well,

No, I think not see above.

[...]
> Fact is, there is no need to announce your posting style. Sort of
>retarded, actually.

Perhaps but once again that isn't what you said. You were wrong once
again.


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Ken Smith on
In article <845vd2dag0tfvdhg266ful89dha4utmp07(a)4ax.com>,
Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net
>(Ken Smith) Gave us:
>
>>In article <or6td2l1ns341lon8jm367b2og4ellj361(a)4ax.com>,
>>Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:16:17 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net
>>>(Ken Smith) Gave us:
>>>
>>>>The dirt starts eating up your signal before you get to a GHz.
>>>
>>> That must be why nothing passes through your head.
>>
>>Oh, what an amazing technical comment! My my, how it hurts me so much to
>>be insulted by Phat again.
>>
>>At least you didn't claim that GPR could see to the center of the earth.
>>This I see as some improvement.
>>
>
> You mean you never saw the movie "The Core"???
>
> Bwuahahahahahahahah! (you won't likely get that one either).

Actually, yes I did see the movie "The Core". For that matter, I saw it
in a theater when it first came out and paided no more than seeing it was
worth, ei: nothing.



--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: joseph2k on
Reg Edwards wrote:

>
> "Phat Bytestard" wrote
>> Saddam was killing people from the moment he was released from
> prison
>> in 1969 to the moment we put him back in one.
> =====================================
>
> Saddam was doing his best for his country.

I do think that this twit wants "W" and Blair to start killing their
citizens at the same rate as Saddam.

--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  
--Schiller
From: David DiGiacomo on
In article <44d32d84$0$2028$ba620dc5(a)text.nova.planet.nl>,
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>Analog Devices' Barry Gilbert was a lecturer in the U.K. ( at the Portsmouth
>Technical College IIRR) before he got head-hunted to the U.S. by Analog
>Devices.

I'm not sure what your point was, but:

"Barrie Gilbert (IEEE Member 1962, Fellow, 1984), b. 1937, in Bournemouth,
England, pursued an early interest in solid-state devices at Mullard Ltd,
working on first-generation planar ICs. Emigrating to the US in 1964, he
joined Tektronix, in Beaverton, Oregon ..."