From: nospam on
In article <hXdqn.106681$1n5.102347(a)newsfe04.iad>, Mocassin joe
<joemocasanto(a)aol.com> wrote:

> Yes. You can carry your iPad around in a little case with all the
> peripherals. Or buy trousers with very big pockets to keep all the junk you
> need to carry around.

<http://www.ohnodoom.com/ibap/>
From: nospam on
In article <hobpd9$7d4$00$2(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann
<peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote:

> Translation: Nothing exists which you can simply carry around.

yet you want usb ports to plug in hard drives and printers and whatever
else. you can't even keep your own story straight.
From: Fa-groon on
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:43:41 -0700, Peter Köhlmann wrote
(in article <hobn7t$938$02$2(a)news.t-online.com>):

> Fa-groon wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:42:44 -0700, hh wrote
>> (in article
>> <460c2323-dbc9-4ac9-b8d5-abde7308fa39(a)l25g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>):
>>
>>> chrisv <chr...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> nospam wrote:
>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> USB ports would be a nice added feature, at extremely low cost.
>>>>
>>>>> a lot of things would be nice to have, but they don't come for free.
>>>>
>>>> Some things make sense to have, because they are quite useful and
>>>> afforable.
>>>>
>>>>> and what exactly were you wanting to connect to it, anyway?
>>>>
>>>> Storage, keyboard, camera, other possibilities.
>>>
>>>
>>> USB is an implimentation, not a capability.
>>>
>>> Try making the distinction between having the *capability*, and how a
>>> capability is *implimented*. Then look again at the problem
>>> statement...you very well might not have a capability gap.
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> BTW, everything mentioned above: Storage, keyboard, camera, etc. can be
>> connected to an iPad.
>
> Just not directly. You need just another totally useless gadget, to get
> functionality anyone outside of the apple cargo cult would take for
> granted
>

So, if it's possible to connect these things , why do you insist that it's
not? I agree that there should be a USB port on the thing, but I don't lie
and argue that USB connectivity is absent from the thing like you do. You're
just a hate-filled FUD monger at this point.

From: JF Mezei on
chrisv wrote:

> These Apple fanbois are something else, aren't they?
>


Why can't you be tolerant and allow us to practice our religion in peace
? Does it disrupt your own life if we go worship at the Apple Store ? Or
religiously watch every Apple Keynote address ? Nobody is forcing you do
do any of that.


The Church of Apple does not mount jihads against Linux. And we both
share a common enemy: Microsoft. There is no reason for Linux zealots to
spend so much time questioning the validity of the Church of Apple.

And since OS-X is based on Unix, both our religions share a lot at the
core even though belonging to the Church of Apple costs more.

When Google produces a big Android pad to compete against the iPad, do
you really expect the members of the Church of Apple to come to your
newsgroups and bash the product left and right and insult any one who
buys them ? No.

Why can't you do the same for the ipad ?

If the product doesn't fit your needs, don't buy it. nobody is forcing
you to buy it, nobody is forcing you to convert to the Church of Apple
and become a devout follower of our god, Steve Jobs.
From: JF Mezei on
nospam wrote:

>> Yes. You can carry your iPad around in a little case with all the
>> peripherals. Or buy trousers with very big pockets to keep all the junk you
>> need to carry around.
>
> <http://www.ohnodoom.com/ibap/>

Shouldn't the pocket be in the front ? Less chances of it being crushed
when you sit down, less chances of someone stealing it while standing on
a bus, and easier for your hands to take in/out of pocket when it is a
front pocket.

Has someone contacted Warren Buffet to find out is Bershire Hattaway
will start to make work shirts with a large enough breast pocket to
carry the ipad ?