From: Peter Köhlmann on
nospam wrote:

> In article <4baa2dca$1(a)news.x-privat.org>, Ian Hilliard
> <nospam(a)hilliardtech.com> wrote:
>
>> A typical user IS going to want to transfer content in an out using a
>> USB-Stick. A typical user is going to want to hook up to a camera using
>> a USB cable.
>
> you've done surveys? didn't think so.

Well, you don't want to transfer images from the camera to your shiny new
toy?

>> A typical user is occasionally going to want to connect to
>> an Ethernet cable.
>
> it's *far* more convenient to use wifi.

Certainly. *Especially* when you want to transfer some photos from your
digital camera to the iPad.
After all, everyone and his cat knows that cameras *always* have WiFi
built in

>> This would have been possible with an Apple USB to
>> Ethernet adapter. A typical user is going to want to be able to back up
>> their system using a USB drive.
>
> it's trivial to back up an ipad, ipod touch or iphone. oddly enough,
> it's via usb.

Too bad that it just does not work for the iPad without hooking it up to
yet another gear
--
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

From: Peter Köhlmann on
nospam wrote:

> In article <hocgqm$jgk$00$2(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter Köhlmann
> <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote:
>
>> >> Translation: Nothing exists which you can simply carry around.
>> >
>> > yet you want usb ports to plug in hard drives and printers and
>> > whatever else. you can't even keep your own story straight.
>>
>> Right. Why would I not want that?
>
> so you want usb not because of any particular need for it, but just
> because it's another item on a checklist. got it.

Putting words in other peoples mouth seems to be one of the traits of you
dishonest cult members

>> After all, without those, the iPad is basically a oversized iPod.
>
> and the ipod is a very successful product.

So what? What has that to do with the fact that the iPad isn't supposed to
be an oversized extremely overpriced iPod?

>> And what is this "not keeping the story straight" thing?
>
> you said you want usb ports to plug in peripherals but then put a
> limitation on how big they can be. can't have it both ways.

This is the second time you are putting words in my mouth in just one
short post.
Lying seems to be the only thing you do regularly. Not surprising, you are
a apple fanboi and cult member

>> It was you fanboiz who tried every trick in the book to obfuscate the
>> fact that your overpriced toy does not even have something as simple
>> and basic as a USB connector
>
> a lot of devices don't and it doesn't seem to be a problem.

A lot of devices don't pretend to be something like a computer
--
If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.

From: nospam on
In article <hodjft$3m0$02$2(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann
<peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote:

> >> After all, without those, the iPad is basically a oversized iPod.
> >
> > and the ipod is a very successful product.
>
> So what? What has that to do with the fact that the iPad isn't supposed to
> be an oversized extremely overpriced iPod?

if it's a 'big ipod touch' then why wouldn't the same basic design as
an ipod touch be just as successful? if not more so, because a larger
screen makes a lot of things much better, such as reading a book.

> >> It was you fanboiz who tried every trick in the book to obfuscate the
> >> fact that your overpriced toy does not even have something as simple
> >> and basic as a USB connector
> >
> > a lot of devices don't and it doesn't seem to be a problem.
>
> A lot of devices don't pretend to be something like a computer

good thing it's not doing that then.
From: nospam on
In article <hodj82$3m0$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann
<peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote:

> >> A typical user IS going to want to transfer content in an out using a
> >> USB-Stick. A typical user is going to want to hook up to a camera using
> >> a USB cable.
> >
> > you've done surveys? didn't think so.
>
> Well, you don't want to transfer images from the camera to your shiny new
> toy?

personally, no. i'd rather copy them to a computer and adjust them on a
22" display. if i need more space for more photos, i'll just buy more
flash cards (they're cheap) or get a hard drive based portable storage
device.

the ipad is not ideal for dumping photos during a shoot. however, for
those who do want to transfer photos directly, there's a way to do
that.

> >> This would have been possible with an Apple USB to
> >> Ethernet adapter. A typical user is going to want to be able to back up
> >> their system using a USB drive.
> >
> > it's trivial to back up an ipad, ipod touch or iphone. oddly enough,
> > it's via usb.
>
> Too bad that it just does not work for the iPad without hooking it up to
> yet another gear

hilarious. how exactly do you do a backup without connecting it to
something else?
From: -hh on
Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlm...(a)t-online.de> wrote:
> nospam wrote:
> > Ian Hilliard <nos...(a)hilliardtech.com> wrote:
>
> >> A typical user IS going to want to transfer content in an out using a
> >> USB-Stick. A typical user is going to want to hook up to a camera using
> >> a USB cable.
>
> > you've done surveys? didn't think so.
>
> Well, you don't want to transfer images from the camera to your shiny
> new toy?

It will probably be adequate for casual peepers, for the basic reason
that they're not going to have many pics and those that they do have
will be JPEGs.

However, trying to use it as a photographer's "Digital Wallet" is
problematic because of its relatively small 16-32-64GB storage
capacities. For a baseline, Hyperdrive's current product line now
starts at 160GB and has sizes up to 640GB.


> >> A typical user is occasionally going to want to connect to
> >> an Ethernet cable.
>
> > it's *far* more convenient to use wifi.
>
> Certainly. *Especially* when you want to transfer some photos from your
> digital camera to the iPad.
> After all, everyone and his cat knows that cameras *always* have WiFi
> built in

If you've been paying attention to the camera market, you would know
that WiFi is one of the new emerging camera features. A related one
is integrated GPS to permit EXIF-automated Geo-Location tagging.


> >> This would have been possible with an Apple USB to
> >> Ethernet adapter. A typical user is going to want to be able to back up
> >> their system using a USB drive.
>
> > it's trivial to back up an ipad, ipod touch or iphone. oddly enough,
> > it's via usb.
>
> Too bad that it just does not work for the iPad without hooking it up to
> yet another gear

Which was the apparently-too-subtle-for-you clue that its not intended
to be a standalone (like a Netbook).


-hh