From: Jolly Roger on
In article <yob39zb9fdo.fsf(a)panix1.panix.com>,
BreadWithSpam(a)fractious.net wrote:

> MaxS <maxs(a)ljhjkjkhkh.com> writes:
>
> > True, but the real reason is that, since Flash is all over the net,
> > anytime you'll want to have "moving pictures" on the Pad, iTune will
> > be the "natural" choice.
>
> Not at all. Youtube was on board early. Netflix is readying an iPad
> app, and Hulu's been working on one, too, reportedly.

Netflix is already there. I installed it last night.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Steve Hix on
In article <slrnhrhml2.2tjv.ianji33(a)zenatode.org.uk>,
Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> wrote:

> On 2010-04-04, Steve Hix <sehix(a)NOSPAMmac.comINVALID> wrote:
>
> > Youtube has offered non-Flash video for iPhone/iPod touch and personal
> > computers for a long time. They're H.264, work at least as well as the
> > Flash versions, and just fine on the iPad.
>
> Not only that, but if you go to the following URL and click on "Join the
> HTML5 beta" then YouTube gives you a cookie which results in it serving
> stuff to you as HTML5/H.264 in Safari on a Mac:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/html5

I don't recall doing anything at all, and Youtube serves up h.264 rather
than Flash in Safari for me.
From: Steve Hix on
In article <hpaobi$k8v$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
MaxS <maxs(a)ljhjkjkhkh.com> wrote:

> On 04/03/2010 10:20 PM, nospam wrote:
> > In article<hp8srt$1bh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, MaxS
> > <maxs(a)ljhjkjkhkh.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>> True, but the real reason is that, since Flash is all over the net,
> >>>> anytime you'll want to have "moving pictures" on the Pad, iTune will be
> >>>> the "natural" choice.
> >>>
> >>> there's a youtube, netflix, slingbox apps ane even a hulu app coming
> >>> sometime, as well as others.
> >>
> >> Coming sometime?
> >
> > when it's done
> >
> >> An app that will "translate" youtube's Flash?
> >
> > youtube has supported h.264 since 2007. it doesn't translate flash.
>
> h.264 is only a subset of what's available in Flash. For now.

That roughly like saying that an orange is only a subset of what's in a
ham sandwich wrapper.

For that matter, the actual content of a Flash stream might be h.264, it
might be something else.
From: Steve Hix on
In article <hpaoq6$7qh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
MaxS <maxs(a)ljhjkjkhkh.com> wrote:

> On 04/04/2010 02:17 PM, Steve Hix wrote:
>
> > See, that's the difference between listening to the voices in your head,
> > and actual experience with reality.
>
> The "voices in my head" tell me that, for the same kind of money, I'm
> much better off waiting for a netbook with a 12" screen and a more
> capable CPU that will send HD to my TV set.
>
> Just an opinion, of course. I all depends on how you love Apple's toys.

Or how reliable the voices in your head aren't.
From: Wes Groleau on
On 04-04-2010 15:50, Barry Margolin wrote:
> My favorite example is Bridge Base Online (www.bridgebase.com). The
> programmers have not expressed any intent to rewrite the Flash app for
> the iPad. It's a small operation, they don't have the resources to

Would Bridge Baron satisfy you? It is in the app store.

Free version has 24 canned deals.
Pay version is fully random shuffling.

--
Wes Groleau

Methods meddling by amateurs
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/WWW?itemid=889