From: BradGuth on
On Aug 8, 5:47 pm, RichD <r_delaney2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >This is another reason why hybrids make more sense. Pure EVs
> > > > >have too many limitations.
>
> > > > If they could recharge in 10 mins, the US power grid would burn out
>
> > > What about these?
> > >http://altairnano.com/markets_amps.html
>
> > Shockingly expensive. $75,000 per vehicle just for batteries.
> >http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/07/altair_nanotech.html
>
> Expensive, who cares? We're talking about the
> ENVIRONMENT, we can't worry about filty lucre.
> What are you, a greedy Republican?
>
> Let the gov't fund it, won't cost a farthing! That's
> why we need visionaries like Al Gore, bold men
> not afraid to take on the special interests, leading
> by example.
>
> --
> Rich

Jews want absolutely nothing to do with your kind, as clearly
demonstrated by way of those posting against your every kind thought.
It's what Jews do best, even if it means having to put another one of
their own kind on a stick.
- Brad Guth

From: Ian on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46BA500A.5C1C0AF7(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> Bobo The Chimp wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:53:28 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
>> > Jim Thompson wrote:
>> >
>> >> It is so sad. I just realized that Eeyore must be posting from a
>> >> mental institution ;-)
>> >
>> > So how many ounces do you have in a ton ?
>>
>> Thirty-two thousand. Why do you ask? Is the math too hard?
>
> I think it's 38,540 in a British ton but I'm no longer sure of the
> numbers.
>
> Graham
>
35840

Regards
Ian


From: James Arthur on
On Aug 8, 10:22 pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 9:57 pm, James Arthur <dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 8, 3:42 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > James Arthur wrote:
> > > > Meanwhile, the US' total CO2 output fell last year. Has anyone
> > > > noticed? I thought not.
>
> > > Obviously since it's not something that can result in increased fear and alarm,
> > > the meeja won't be interested.
>
> > > Do you have a link for that ?
>
> > > Graham
>
> > See page 2 of this:
> > http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/flash/flash.html
>
> The numbers indicate that this measure is an indicator of a depressed
> economy.

Yes, the words say that, but the economy is thriving, not depressed.

I did find it interesting that there's a surge in CO2 every election
year. :-)

Cheers,
James Arthur

From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:57:12 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
> RichD wrote:
>> On Jul 28, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >This is another reason why hybrids make more sense. Pure EVs
>> > > > >have too many limitations.
>> >
>> > > > If they could recharge in 10 mins, the US power grid would burn out
>> >
>> > > What about these?
>> > >http://altairnano.com/markets_amps.html
>> >
>> > Shockingly expensive. $75,000 per vehicle just for batteries.
>> > http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/07/altair_nanotech.html
>>
>> Expensive, who cares? We're talking about the
>> ENVIRONMENT, we can't worry about filty lucre.
>> What are you, a greedy Republican?
>>
>> Let the gov't fund it, won't cost a farthing! That's
>> why we need visionaries like Al Gore, bold men
>> not afraid to take on the special interests, leading
>> by example.
>
> LOL !
>
> Al Gore is going to look such an idiot in a couple of years.
>

You mean like Paul Ehrlich? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

From: Bob Myers on

"BradGuth" <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186676826.644798.326820(a)z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

>
> Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero
> NOx?

You find a practical way to move a real-world three-ton wheeled
vehicle 100 miles on a gallon-of-gas-equivalent, and I guarantee
you you'll have PLENTY of people's attention.

But you don't really have that, do you?

Bob M.