From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:50:09 -0700, Richard Henry
<pomerado(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 9, 9:59 am, James Arthur <dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 8, 10:22 pm, Richard Henry <pomer...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 8, 9:57 pm, James Arthur <dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Aug 8, 3:42 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > James Arthur wrote:
>> > > > > Meanwhile, the US' total CO2 output fell last year. Has anyone
>> > > > > noticed? I thought not.
>>
>> > > > Obviously since it's not something that can result in increased fear and alarm,
>> > > > the meeja won't be interested.
>>
>> > > > Do you have a link for that ?
>>
>> > > > Graham
>>
>> > > See page 2 of this:
>> > > http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/flash/flash.html
>>
>> > The numbers indicate that this measure is an indicator of a depressed
>> > economy.
>>
>> Yes, the words say that, but the economy is thriving, not depressed.
>
>By what indicator? White House press release volume?
>
>Durable goods orders and shipments are mixed, new home starts are way
>down, the stock market is oscillating wildly, GFP annual growth rate
>is 1.2% (low on historic scale). But cheer up: e-commerce sales are
>doing nicely. All that online shopping may be impacting worker
>productivity.
>

My personal "indicator", my own work load, is WAY up.

This historically means...

The Democrats are coming

And a BIG recession

Enjoy! I sure will, I need to salt away some more retirement funds to
cover all the cruises, etc. I want to take ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
From: Eeyore on


Ian wrote:

> "Eeyore" wrote
> > Bobo The Chimp wrote:
> >> Eeyore wrote:
> >> > Jim Thompson wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> It is so sad. I just realized that Eeyore must be posting from a
> >> >> mental institution ;-)
> >> >
> >> > So how many ounces do you have in a ton ?
> >>
> >> Thirty-two thousand. Why do you ask? Is the math too hard?
> >
> > I think it's 38,540 in a British ton but I'm no longer sure of the
> > numbers.
>
> 35840
>
> Regards
> Ian

Thanks.

Graham


From: Eeyore on


Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > RichD wrote:
> >> On Jul 28, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >This is another reason why hybrids make more sense. Pure EVs
> >> > > > >have too many limitations.
> >> >
> >> > > > If they could recharge in 10 mins, the US power grid would burn out
> >> >
> >> > > What about these?
> >> > >http://altairnano.com/markets_amps.html
> >> >
> >> > Shockingly expensive. $75,000 per vehicle just for batteries.
> >> > http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/07/altair_nanotech.html
> >>
> >> Expensive, who cares? We're talking about the
> >> ENVIRONMENT, we can't worry about filty lucre.
> >> What are you, a greedy Republican?
> >>
> >> Let the gov't fund it, won't cost a farthing! That's
> >> why we need visionaries like Al Gore, bold men
> >> not afraid to take on the special interests, leading
> >> by example.
> >
> > LOL !
> >
> > Al Gore is going to look such an idiot in a couple of years.
>
> You mean like Paul Ehrlich? ;-)

Interesting comparison. He got plenty of doom-mongering predictions wrong. Yet
it seemed to make sense at the time.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


Bob Myers wrote:

> "BradGuth" <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote
> >
> > Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero
> > NOx?
>
> You find a practical way to move a real-world three-ton wheeled
> vehicle 100 miles on a gallon-of-gas-equivalent, and I guarantee
> you you'll have PLENTY of people's attention.
>
> But you don't really have that, do you?

He also doesn't have any hydrogen peroxide wells. And no, I don't have the
faintest clue why he's obsessional about it either.

Graham

From: Gordon on
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:57:12 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>RichD wrote:
>
(snip)
>
>Al Gore is going to look such an idiot in a couple of years.
>
>Graham
>
In a couple of years? Yet to happen? He's already been there,
done that, a few years back in the past, eh, wot? ;-)