From: Tom Stiller on
In article <michelle-5F7574.12411231012010(a)nothing.attdns.com>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <tom_stiller-A1FB61.13495631012010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "In the year of our Lord 1432, there arose a grievous quarrel among
> > > > > > the brethren over the number of teeth in the mouth of a horse. For
> > > > > > 13 days the disputation raged without ceasing...".
> > > > >
> > > > > Does that mean that horse meat tastes like bacon?
> > > >
> > > > It would be interesting how you got there from a discussion about the
> > > > iPad user experience without actually handling it and the parable of
> > > > arguing about the number of teeth in a horse's mouth without actually
> > > > counting them.
> > >
> > > That parable is usually attributed to Roger Bacon or Francis Bacon.
> > So? Taking a lesson from the politicians and avoiding the issue?
>
> I didn't avoid the issue; I addressed it head on in an earlier message.
> Your quote of the beginning of that parable was actually supporting what I
> had written two messages upstream of it.

Somehow none of that comes across to me, but whatever...

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
From: Tom Stiller on
In article <michelle-1D0D86.14441031012010(a)nothing.attdns.com>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> In article <tom_stiller-704FFD.16022631012010(a)news.individual.net>,
> Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > "In the year of our Lord 1432, there arose a grievous
> > > > > > > > quarrel among the brethren over the number of teeth in the
> > > > > > > > mouth of a horse. For 13 days the disputation raged without
> > > > > > > > ceasing...".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does that mean that horse meat tastes like bacon?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It would be interesting how you got there from a discussion
> > > > > > about the iPad user experience without actually handling it and
> > > > > > the parable of arguing about the number of teeth in a horse's
> > > > > > mouth without actually counting them.
> > > > >
> > > > > That parable is usually attributed to Roger Bacon or Francis
> > > > > Bacon.
> > > > So? Taking a lesson from the politicians and avoiding the issue?
> > >
> > > I didn't avoid the issue; I addressed it head on in an earlier
> > > message. Your quote of the beginning of that parable was actually
> > > supporting what I had written two messages upstream of it.
> >
> > Somehow none of that comes across to me, but whatever...
>
> Alan Brown wrote this:
>
> > I've had this argument with my son. He believes that your fingers are
> > so close to the screen (above the keyboard) that gestures will be quite
> > easy. To be seen.
>
> To which I replied this:
>
> This is all theoretical; except for a few hundred journalists, for a
> few minutes each, right after the presentation, no one outside of
> Apple has actually used it.
>
> But so many people know what the experience will be like, even though
> they haven't had that experience.
>
> JF Mezei responded to that with this:
>
> > This is called intelligence. The ability to visualise an experience
> > before it happens based on the information of what that experience might
> > be like.
>
> And you replied with the parable.
>
> Now does it come across?

I still don't see the connection to "Does that mean that horse meat
tastes like bacon?" except for the real stretch from the content of the
parable to the [supposed] author.

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
From: JF Mezei on
Michael Siemon wrote:

> Well, actually it _could_ be -- in the sense that the iPad interface
> might make it easier to do the things it does. The problem is that
> iWork (and for me, especially Numbers) just _doesn't_ do what I need.

Lets be blunt here. Ipad, like ipod touch is an adult gadget, an adult
toy, a portable game player that can also do some serious stuff.

If you start with this premise, the Ipad is an incredible machine that
can do a lot for a mobile device/toy.

If you start with the premise that the IpAd is a computer, then yeah,
you can point to many weaknesses.

It has to do with expectations.

And just like those who have iphones/ipodtouch get addicted to it and
find great ways to use it on top of its core role of games/music player,
the same will happen to the IpAd and there will be even more "serious"
uses for it.

But a computer, it is not.
From: Michael Siemon on
In article <000e7ddc$0$2284$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>,
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote:

> Michael Siemon wrote:
>
> > Well, actually it _could_ be -- in the sense that the iPad interface
> > might make it easier to do the things it does. The problem is that
> > iWork (and for me, especially Numbers) just _doesn't_ do what I need.
>
> Lets be blunt here. Ipad, like ipod touch is an adult gadget, an adult
> toy, a portable game player that can also do some serious stuff.
>
> If you start with this premise, the Ipad is an incredible machine that
> can do a lot for a mobile device/toy.
>
> If you start with the premise that the IpAd is a computer, then yeah,
> you can point to many weaknesses.
>
> It has to do with expectations.
>
> And just like those who have iphones/ipodtouch get addicted to it and
> find great ways to use it on top of its core role of games/music player,
> the same will happen to the IpAd and there will be even more "serious"
> uses for it.
>
> But a computer, it is not.

Well, as I said in another context, it _is_ a computer -- just not a
general purpose one. Yes, some of the limitations are such that I
would find constrictive. But in fact, I think it is a very well thought
out gadget, and one I am moderately likely to get in the rev. 2 version.

Most of what I dislike in my iPhone (tiny and almost useless "keyboard",
minuscule display of what I want to look at) is in fact addressed quite
well in the iPad. I got the iPhone _because_ as cell-phone it is a hell
of a lot better than anything I saw before. But as to its use as a web
portal, well, my reaction is "meh!". (There are some interesting
exceptions to my generally negative evaluation here. I have a rather
good metronome app, and a tuning app, that substitute for moderately
expensive gadgets that I really _don't_ want to be carrying around.

I like the iPhone being "many things to many people" -- even if it
cannot be "all things to all people." The metronome and tuning apps
would definitely NOT be "better" on the iPad; they are ideal for the
small form factor. But a lot of stuff I'd be interested in would work
exceptionally well on the iPad.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Per_R=F8nne?= on
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote:

> And just like those who have iphones/ipodtouch get addicted to it and
> find great ways to use it on top of its core role of games/music player,
> the same will happen to the IpAd and there will be even more "serious"
> uses for it.

Personally, I mainly use my iPhone as a PDA with important applications
like Pocket Informant [organizer wih calendar, tasks - and sync to Mac
or Win], dictionaries like Shorter Oxford Dictionary and various
bilingual dictionaries and a graph calculator. And a lot of useful petty
applications that will show me when the next train will leave the
station - and what movies I can watch nearby cinemas. Etc, etc.

And then of course I use it as a cellphone too ... and tether it to my
MacBook when in need such that it can connect to the internet where no
WiFi or cable is available. Well, I don't live in AT&T Land:-).
--
Per Erik R�nne
http://www.RQNNE.dk
Errare humanum est, sed in errore perseverare turpe