The iPad Is Here
in [Mac Systems]
|
From: Mike Rosenberg on 27 Jan 2010 20:35 Per R�nne <per(a)RQNNE.invalid> wrote: > No need for an iPod Touch when you have already got an iPhone:-). I have a client who has both, and I haven't figured out why. -- My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Steve Hix on 27 Jan 2010 21:16 In article <000fa8c4$0$2269$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote: > BTW, if their 3G version will be crippled like that of the iphone > (locked to a particular network), it will be useless to those who would > use a tablet the most: travellers. Do a little homework on today's announcements. Apple specifically states that the 3G support is unlocked with support for carriers that offer GSM micro SIM cards.
From: Steve Hix on 27 Jan 2010 21:20 In article <00dc9af9$0$17126$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote: > Out of curiosity, where did you guys hear that the iPad 3G would be > unlocked ? http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/apple_ipad_to_sport_unlocked_3g_su pport/ as one example.
From: Davoud on 27 Jan 2010 22:30 Per R�nne: > > No need for an iPod Touch when you have already got an iPhone:-). Mike Rosenberg: > I have a client who has both, and I haven't figured out why. Possibly for the same reason my wife and I each have both an iPhone and an iPod Touch. Because we _want_ one of each. It never occurred to me that we might need a reason beyond that, any more than we feel the need to justify having six Macs in regular (meaning daily) use in our home. (They are 15 and 17" MB Pros; two Intel iMacs, including a new 27" 8GB/2TB; one PowerBook G4; and one nicely equipped Dual G5.) Davoud -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: nospam on 27 Jan 2010 23:41
In article <tph-B6203F.16570527012010(a)localhost>, Tom Harrington <tph(a)pcisys.no.spam.dammit.net> wrote: > But it uses a "micro-SIM". Is that commonly available? I don't know a > lot about SIMs but replaceability only matters if replacements are > actually available. it's the next generation sim card. it does more and takes up less space. presumably future phones will use them. it wouldn't surprise me if the next iphone used one too. |