From: bill.sloman on
On 23 nov, 21:34, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote:
> > Scarcely. The cooling was real enough, if insignificant - and probably
> > had something to do with sulphur-dioxide-generated haze, which went
> > away when we tackled acid rain.
>
> Is there 'probably' a global warming God too ?

Why don't you ask her?

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: krw on
In article <492B36FE.9050404(a)electrooptical.net>,
pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net says...>
> bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
>
> > As Arthur C. Clark put it, "any sufficiently advanced
> > science is indistinguishable from magic" and Rich's understanding is
> > retarded enough that the scientific basis for anthropogenic global
> > warming does look like magic to him, along with TV and matches.
>
> Since the SNR of this thread is way too low for even DFE to fix, I'd
> just like to give my favourite corollary to Clarke's Law:
>
> "Any technology that is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
> advanced."
>
> So everybody get busy doing engineering. ;)

I bet you could design a kill filter if you had too. ;-)

From: Phil Hobbs on
krw wrote:
> In article <492B36FE.9050404(a)electrooptical.net>,
> pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net says...>
>> bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
>>
>>> As Arthur C. Clark put it, "any sufficiently advanced
>>> science is indistinguishable from magic" and Rich's understanding is
>>> retarded enough that the scientific basis for anthropogenic global
>>> warming does look like magic to him, along with TV and matches.
>> Since the SNR of this thread is way too low for even DFE to fix, I'd
>> just like to give my favourite corollary to Clarke's Law:
>>
>> "Any technology that is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
>> advanced."
>>
>> So everybody get busy doing engineering. ;)
>
> I bet you could design a kill filter if you had too. ;-)
>

"Go ahead, make my day."

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
From: Phil Hobbs on
krw wrote:
> In article <492B36FE.9050404(a)electrooptical.net>,
> pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net says...>
>> bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
>>
>>> As Arthur C. Clark put it, "any sufficiently advanced
>>> science is indistinguishable from magic" and Rich's understanding is
>>> retarded enough that the scientific basis for anthropogenic global
>>> warming does look like magic to him, along with TV and matches.
>> Since the SNR of this thread is way too low for even DFE to fix, I'd
>> just like to give my favourite corollary to Clarke's Law:
>>
>> "Any technology that is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
>> advanced."
>>
>> So everybody get busy doing engineering. ;)
>
> I bet you could design a kill filter if you had too. ;-)
>

"Go ahead, make my day."

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
From: Eeyore on


bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > bill.slo...(a)ieee.org wrote:
> > > growing corn the American way requires burning enough oil to more
> > > than counter-balance the carbon capture in the growing corn
> >
> > Even that's untrue. It's a common myth. The ROEI is a good 2:1 with modern
> > processes. So the naysayers quote old methods and studies only.
>
> And your evidence to support this claim can be found where?

Have you ever heard of Google ? I discovered it so long ago I no longer have it
in my bookmarks.

Best modern practice was knocking on 2.2 IIRC. Despite the fact that corn is a
LOUSY source for bio-ethanol.

In the UK, Shell ? or is it BP ? and Du Pont are working on converting a
bio-ethanol plant originally planned by British Sugar to process surplus sugar
beet into bio-ethanol to make bio-butanol.

Butanol can be regarded as a straight replacement for petrol. NO changes
required. Energy density is virtually identical and it burns very cleanly in an
ICE.

Screw YOU !

Graham