From: Lew on
Peter Olcott wrote:
>>> There are apparently Chinese equivalents to the digit
>>> [0-9].
>>> How does Java handle this for Chinese programmers?

Lew wrote:
>> By making them use '0' through '9', as Jeff Higgins
>> explained upthread.

Peter Olcott wrote:
>> --
>> Lew

Don't quote sigs.

> Isn't this a little ethnocentristic?

No.

--
Lew
From: Peter Olcott on

"Arne Vajh�j" <arne(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
news:4bf936f1$0$285$14726298(a)news.sunsite.dk...
> On 23-05-2010 09:58, Peter Olcott wrote:
>> "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message
>> news:hta6lq$jh8$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>>> Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>> There are apparently Chinese equivalents to the digit
>>>> [0-9].
>>>> How does Java handle this for Chinese programmers?
>>>
>>> By making them use '0' through '9', as Jeff Higgins
>>> explained upthread.
>>
>> I am guessing that this prohibits mainland China
>> developers
>> from using java, because of their cultural purity laws.
>
> I don't know much about China.
>
> But what do they do when writing C code for GCC on
> their Linux flavor?
>
> Arne
>

From what I understand they must write all code in assembly
language because no other language is sufficiently adapted
to their culture.


From: Peter Olcott on

"Lew" <noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message
news:htbe56$c5r$3(a)news.albasani.net...
> Peter Olcott wrote:
>> In China because of their cultural purity laws they would
>> miss out on being able to use Java for development at
>> all.
>
> Mainland China. They might not be so restrictive in
> Taiwan.
>
> Are you quite sure that what you say is even true in
> mainland China? Care to cite some references to
> substantiate that claim?
>
> --
> Lew

I heard this from two different reliable sources on
newsgroups.


From: Jeff Higgins on
On 5/23/2010 1:29 PM, Peter Olcott wrote:
> "Arne Vajh�j"<arne(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
> news:4bf936f1$0$285$14726298(a)news.sunsite.dk...
>> On 23-05-2010 09:58, Peter Olcott wrote:
>>> "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hta6lq$jh8$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>>>> Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>>> There are apparently Chinese equivalents to the digit
>>>>> [0-9].
>>>>> How does Java handle this for Chinese programmers?
>>>>
>>>> By making them use '0' through '9', as Jeff Higgins
>>>> explained upthread.
>>>
>>> I am guessing that this prohibits mainland China
>>> developers
>>> from using java, because of their cultural purity laws.
>>
>> I don't know much about China.
>>
>> But what do they do when writing C code for GCC on
>> their Linux flavor?
>>
>> Arne
>>
>
> From what I understand they must write all code in assembly
> language because no other language is sufficiently adapted
> to their culture.
>
>
Sounds like a big opportunity for the right language developer.


From: Mike Schilling on
Jeff Higgins wrote:
> On 5/23/2010 1:29 PM, Peter Olcott wrote:
>> "Arne Vajh�j"<arne(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
>> news:4bf936f1$0$285$14726298(a)news.sunsite.dk...
>>> On 23-05-2010 09:58, Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>> "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:hta6lq$jh8$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>>>>> Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>>>> There are apparently Chinese equivalents to the digit
>>>>>> [0-9].
>>>>>> How does Java handle this for Chinese programmers?
>>>>>
>>>>> By making them use '0' through '9', as Jeff Higgins
>>>>> explained upthread.
>>>>
>>>> I am guessing that this prohibits mainland China
>>>> developers
>>>> from using java, because of their cultural purity laws.
>>>
>>> I don't know much about China.
>>>
>>> But what do they do when writing C code for GCC on
>>> their Linux flavor?
>>>
>>> Arne
>>>
>>
>> From what I understand they must write all code in assembly
>> language because no other language is sufficiently adapted
>> to their culture.
>>
>>
> Sounds like a big opportunity for the right language developer.

Writing a preprocessor that allows "Java in Chinese" would take at most a
few weeks.