What do real scientist say about Abiogenesis:Alexandre Meinesz:
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Einstein...The Creationists' Friend.
Next: look upon 231! not as #rearrangements but as volume or time Chapt 19 #221 Atom Totality
From: Jason on 24 Jul 2010 12:23 > >> >>> "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, > >> >>> having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and > >> >>> that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed > >> >>> law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most > >> >>> beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being, evolved." > >> >>> Charles Darwin > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Damn Jason, I don't see where he mentions "Gawd". Perhaps you cam > >> >> point this out to me. > >> > > >> > Compare the above statement to Genesis 2:7 and the above statement by > >> > Darwin makes perfect sense. Keep in mind that Darwin was a Christian > >> > during the younger days of his life and knew all about the > >> > Bible--esp. the first several chapters of Genesis. Who else but God > >> > can breath life into people. If Darwin was NOT discussing God > >> > breathing life into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he > >> > discussing? > >> > >> > >> I debated this point with you a few days ago and you just keep blowing > >> right on by it. Go back and read what I said! > > > > I will ask once again--If Darwin was NOT discussing God breathing life > > into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he discussing? I delete > > posts that I have already read. > > > By "already read", I take it you mean "contain things I don't wanna > see"... You failed to answer the above question.
From: Jason on 24 Jul 2010 12:25 In article <2dcfcfcd-3b78-463b-95f6-aba3ed2ad9a6(a)c36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, "Bob T." <bob(a)synapse-cs.com> wrote: > On Jul 23, 8:11=A0pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > > > I will ask once again--If Darwin was NOT discussing God breathing life > > into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he discussing. > > He was obviously talking about the very beginnings of life, > microscopic in size, billions of years before humans existed. > > > I delete posts that I have already read. > > You apparently delete them from your brain, as well, because you keep > asking questions that have already been answered. > > - Bob T > > > - Show quoted text - He mentioned the word "breathing"--what did Darwin mean if he was NOT discussing BREATHING life into Adam and perhaps also Eve?
From: Bob T. on 24 Jul 2010 12:26 On Jul 24, 9:23Â am, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > >> >>> "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, > > >> >>> having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and > > >> >>> that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed > > >> >>> law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most > > >> >>> beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being, evolved." > > >> >>> â¹ Charles Darwin > > > >> >> Damn Jason, I don't see where he mentions "Gawd". Perhaps you cam > > >> >> point this out to me. > > > >> > Compare the above statement to Genesis 2:7 and the above statement by > > >> > Darwin makes perfect sense. Keep in mind that Darwin was a Christian > > >> > during the younger days of his life and knew all about the > > >> > Bible--esp. the first several chapters of Genesis. Who else but God > > >> > can breath life into people. If Darwin was NOT discussing God > > >> > breathing life into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he > > >> > discussing? > > > >> I debated this point with you a few days ago and you just keep blowing > > >> right on by it. Go back and read what I said! > > > > I will ask once again--If Darwin was NOT discussing God breathing life > > > into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he discussing? I delete > > > posts that I have already read. > > > By "already read", I take it you mean "contain things I don't wanna > > see"... > > You failed to answer the above question. Well, I answered it - Darwin was obviously talking about the very earliest, microscopic life forms. To believe otherwise requires incredible obtuseness. Darwin's own theory proposed that humans evolved from pre-human ancestors - even if _you_ believe the Adam & Eve myth, Darwin clearly did not. Try really hard not to delete this fact from your brain, Jason. - Bob T > - Show quoted text -
From: Jason on 24 Jul 2010 12:40 > > You failed to answer the above question. > > Well, I answered it - Darwin was obviously talking about the very > earliest, microscopic life forms. To believe otherwise requires > incredible obtuseness. Darwin's own theory proposed that humans > evolved from pre-human ancestors - even if _you_ believe the Adam & > Eve myth, Darwin clearly did not. > > Try really hard not to delete this fact from your brain, Jason. > > - Bob T What does that have to do with Darwin's "breathing" comment? If God was NOT discussing God breathing life into Adam and perhaps also Eve--what was he discussing? Darwin's statement: "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being, evolved."
From: Syd on 24 Jul 2010 12:50
On Jul 24, 12:23Â pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > >> >>> "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, > > >> >>> having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and > > >> >>> that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed > > >> >>> law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most > > >> >>> beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being, evolved." > > >> >>> â¹ Charles Darwin > > > >> >> Damn Jason, I don't see where he mentions "Gawd". Perhaps you cam > > >> >> point this out to me. > > > >> > Compare the above statement to Genesis 2:7 and the above statement by > > >> > Darwin makes perfect sense. Keep in mind that Darwin was a Christian > > >> > during the younger days of his life and knew all about the > > >> > Bible--esp. the first several chapters of Genesis. Who else but God > > >> > can breath life into people. If Darwin was NOT discussing God > > >> > breathing life into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he > > >> > discussing? > > > >> I debated this point with you a few days ago and you just keep blowing > > >> right on by it. Go back and read what I said! > > > > I will ask once again--If Darwin was NOT discussing God breathing life > > > into Adam and perhaps also into Eve--what was he discussing? I delete > > > posts that I have already read. > > > By "already read", I take it you mean "contain things I don't wanna > > see"... > > You failed to answer the above question. Why should he repeat it again when it's obvious that you don't want to hear it. PDW |