From: Rowland McDonnell on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > So which `fn' key does `eject' map to? And how does that enable a
> >> > non-Apple keyboard to work on a Mac?
> >>
> >> I think the answer is (rather unhelpfully): "it depends". I _think_ it gets
> >> mapped to the last function key, so depending on the keyboard it could well
> >> be F12.
> >
> > Ah - so this new Mac keyboard notionally has 20 f_ keys, yes? F1-F19
> > marked up with numbers, and `eject' which is F20 but not marked as such?
>
> er...unsure. On a made-by-Apple keyboard I'd expect the eject key to *not*
> act like a function key, but that's purely a guess.

<shrug> All function keys do in my experience is `nothing, unless it's
a BBC Micro'.

I can't see any point in bulking out keyboards with keys that have no
purpose in life, but there you go.

[snip]

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on
James Dore <james.dore(a)new.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

[snip]

> I can live with it - more than I can live with modern keyboards, that's
> for sure :-D

You tried my rubber feet idea?

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Woody on
On 22/01/2010 15:13, Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> Jim<jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> Rowland McDonnell<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So which `fn' key does `eject' map to? And how does that enable a
>>>>> non-Apple keyboard to work on a Mac?
>>>>
>>>> I think the answer is (rather unhelpfully): "it depends". I _think_ it gets
>>>> mapped to the last function key, so depending on the keyboard it could well
>>>> be F12.
>>>
>>> Ah - so this new Mac keyboard notionally has 20 f_ keys, yes? F1-F19
>>> marked up with numbers, and `eject' which is F20 but not marked as such?
>>
>> er...unsure. On a made-by-Apple keyboard I'd expect the eject key to *not*
>> act like a function key, but that's purely a guess.
>
> <shrug> All function keys do in my experience is `nothing, unless it's
> a BBC Micro'.
>
> I can't see any point in bulking out keyboards with keys that have no
> purpose in life, but there you go.

I use them a lot on PCs, but I can't think of one program I use on the
mac that uses them


--
Woody
From: James Dore on
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:13:54 -0000, Rowland McDonnell
<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > So which `fn' key does `eject' map to? And how does that enable a
>> >> > non-Apple keyboard to work on a Mac?
>> >>
>> >> I think the answer is (rather unhelpfully): "it depends". I _think_
>> it gets
>> >> mapped to the last function key, so depending on the keyboard it
>> could well
>> >> be F12.
>> >
>> > Ah - so this new Mac keyboard notionally has 20 f_ keys, yes? F1-F19
>> > marked up with numbers, and `eject' which is F20 but not marked as
>> such?
>>
>> er...unsure. On a made-by-Apple keyboard I'd expect the eject key to
>> *not*
>> act like a function key, but that's purely a guess.
>
> <shrug> All function keys do in my experience is `nothing, unless it's
> a BBC Micro'.
>
> I can't see any point in bulking out keyboards with keys that have no
> purpose in life, but there you go.

Ah, you've used Sun Sparcstations then?!

--
James Dore
New College IT Officer
james.dore(a)new / it-support(a)new
From: James Dore on
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:17:25 -0000, Rowland McDonnell
<real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:

> James Dore <james.dore(a)new.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I can live with it - more than I can live with modern keyboards, that's
>> for sure :-D
>
> You tried my rubber feet idea?

Ooh, actually no, and I have a number of suitable candidates too. Will
experiment. Thanks for the reminder!

Ta,
--
James Dore
New College IT Officer
james.dore(a)new / it-support(a)new