From: Ben Dolan on
rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote:
> > > Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement,
> > > Al. You are agreeing with someone who has a weak mind.
> >
> > Being upset about a select set of simple sounds is strange to me.
> > Profanity is such a non-issue for grown-ups, I'm far more interested in
> > the ideas conveyed by the words. You're using the profanity to ignore
> > the point.
>
> You do not have a point. You are using various ideas as an excuse to
> use profanity. It would be more honest to just leave out the ideas
> and have the profanity by itself.

You manage to leave out the ideas AND the profanity! Bravo, child!
From: Smiler on

"Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:6e39kiF53iljU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message
> news:wJUek.31221$Zm1.24559(a)newsfe27.ams2...
>>
>> "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in
>> message
>> news:c53beab3-625f-4b94-9ccf-fe315c8a1d25(a)c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 14, 12:31 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> The more I learn about Europe, the less I want to go there.
>>> Robert B. Winn
>>
>> Yes, some of THEM in Europe are educated. Wouldn't want to mix with
>> those types.
>> ==============================================
>> Correction: MOST of US in Europe are educated.
>>
>
> .... not to mention many of us in Britain ....

Since when has Britain *not* been in Europe?

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:99810d99-3249-4105-aba8-29990daaf899(a)m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 15, 3:58 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
> On Jul 14, 8:30?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:66e61aa9-559f-4671-a2ea-6bc1905bebe9(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jul 13, 6:28?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
> > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:fc9d57b1-a5d8-4dea-b10c-2de186d77c39(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Jul 12, 5:43?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:43c4adf8-d379-4a72-815c-bc35c1c84eaf(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Jul 11, 5:04?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:6ebcae55-3c20-4ea3-960e-25f802c31860(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > On Jul 10, 8:51?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > > >news:1b629e70-db18-4208-a3da-4381dcebabb4(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > On Jul 8, 8:45?pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
>
> > > > > > > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > There were some atheists who said Harry Potter went on the
> > > > > > > > train
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > London to wizard's school.
>
> > > > > > > And once again, child, you have confused fiction with
> > > > > > > reality...
>
> > > > > > Harry Potter is fiction. ?The woman who wrote the books said it
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > fiction. ?I know this may come as a shock to atheists.
> > > > > > ===================================
>
> > > > > > The bible is also fiction. We don't even know who wrote it.
> > > > > > I know this may come as a shock to christians.
> > > > > > Get over it.
>
> > > > > No, Smiler, the Bible tells about the construction of Hezekiah's
> > > > > tunnel. ? Didn't we discuss this before.
> > > > > ================================
> > > > > And the Harry Potter books tell us about Kings Cross station and
> > > > > London.
> > > > > Both the Harry Potter books and the bible are fiction.
> > > > > Get over it.
>
> > > > > Smiler,
>
> > > > If you want to believe that the Bible is fiction, it seems to me
> > > > that
> > > > you are free to believe that the Bible is fiction. ?I will tell you
> > > > what. ?Why don't you decide for yourself what you believe, and I
> > > > will
> > > > decide for myself what I believe? ?Does this seem unfair to you?
> > > > ==============================================
> > > > Not unfair if you keep your stupid beliefs out of a.a.
>
> > > > Smiler,
> > > > The godless one
> > > > a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the
> > > header.
> > > ====================================
> > > That won't stop your stupid comments from appearing in a.a., will it.
> > > You take a.a. out of your header.
>
> > Think about it, Smiler. ?I am not going to go to alt.atheism. ?I have
> > no interest in atheists.
> > ============================
> > Then why do your lying posts appear in a.a., LIAR?
>
> > Smiler,
> > The godless one
> > a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Because you have not yet taken sci.physics and sci.physics relativity
> out of the header.
> Robert B. Winn

To remove your posts from alt.atheism, you would need to take a.a out
of your headers. Us changing ours isn't going to change yours.
Are you going to stop lying soon?
===================================

He can't. He's addicted to it. Aversion therapy would be the only way to
make him stop.
An electric shock everytime he lies. I don't know if the National Grid could
supply that much juice, though.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"Linda Fox" <linda.ff(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:lkjo74hqv70bqn310vs4og4j5kp5varcok(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:47:40 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a(a)b.c>
> wrote:
>
>>Linda Fox wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:44:39 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1Acek.15296$xs1.7418(a)newsfe28.ams2...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but we are all 'closed minded atheists' (whatever that is)
>>>>> here.
>>>> You misheard. We're all clothes-minded.
>>>>
>>> Aah, knickers t'that, y'big girl's blouse.
>>>
>>> Linda ff
>>So good it will sail right over his head..
>
> Uh. The image of rbw with knickers over his head has suddenly added
> whole new dimension to this thread
>

The nearest he'll ever get to a sexual encounter with a real woman, unless
he pays for it.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279


From: Smiler on

"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message
news:3302305a-67d1-4a82-bf2e-0d656d5d9836(a)f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 14, 8:50?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:848a8d5f-0b44-40d4-8d12-8a293bbbcf19(a)z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 13, 3:44?pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:03:40 -0700, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan)
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > >> I'm not looking for converts. I'm simply posting my insights for
> > > >> the
> > > >> benefit of those who may be in the decision making process and want
> > > >> information other than that from a closed minded atheist.
>
> > > >Oops, your prejudices are showing...
>
> > > >And why should anyone give credence to your insights over those of us
> > > >"closed minded atheists"? You strike me as nothing but a run of the
> > > >mill
> > > >religionist, complete with the requisite disdain of atheism. Hardly a
> > > >glowing endorsement worthy of respect.
>
> > > Are you suggesting that I should show about the same level of respect
> > > for atheists as you show for Christians?
>
> > Here's the difference, Skippy. I reserve my scorn and mockery for
> > individuals like yourself, in response to specific claims you have made.
> > I don't disparage "closed minded religionists" as a group. That's being
> > prejudiced, which is why I accused you--not all closed minded
> > religionists.
>
> > I also find it interesting when someone accuses atheists of being closed
> > minded, when in my experience (and I'm not a minority in this), atheists
> > generally are more opened minded, more educated, and more rational than
> > religionists.
>
> > > I don't think I could do this without resorting to a lot of profanity
> > > and
> > > obscenity, and I really don't like using this in my
> > > communications...makes
> > > one look inadequate, insecure and unable to express one's self
> > > fluently.
>
> > There's a difference between fluency and content. While you are fairly
> > fluent, the content of your claims are utterly preposterous.
>
> > And quite frankly, profanity and obscenity (whatever they are) provide a
> > great deal of expressive power when used appropriately. Just listen to
> > any of the late great George Carlin's monologs.
>
> > > I'm not by any means suggesting that anyone give my insights more
> > > credence than those of an atheist. I just want to make my insights
> > > available to those who are still assembling information to help them
> > > make a decision on this. ?
>
> > Well, I have made a decision on this. The insights you offer are
> > nonsensical, puerile, and clearly derived from years of religious
> > indoctrination combined with some sort of bizarre pseudoscientific mumbo
> > jumbo. As I said, hardly a glowing endorsement worthy of any fuckin'
> > respect...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I don't think Gordon likes being called Skippy.
> ================================
> We should care, why?
> =======================
> Maybe you could use his correct name next time.
> ==========================
> When he shows some respect for us by not posting his stupid delusions to
> a.a. then we may show him some respect in return.
> The same applies to you, Skippy #2.
>
> Smiler,

That seems very petulant of you, Smiler.
===========================
Fair's fair, Skippy #2.

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279