Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Smiler on 16 Jul 2008 12:41 "Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message news:cn9p74l4urm0iagn6nqb6d66cpah176n6t(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:06:39 +0100, "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> > wrote: >> >>"Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message > (snip) >>> >>> Atheists and those who believe in God but decline to align with Him >>> can, and do indeed do good things. But, their choice >> >>Why can't you understand that there is NO CHOICE involved? >>If you think there is, please explain how you CHOSE to not believe in >>Leprechauns. >> >>Smiler, >>The godless one >>a.a.# 2279 >> > Smiler, I haven't yet visited all the planets in the multiverse, thus > I haven't confirmed that there are no Leprechauns anywhere in the > multiverse, but I have exercised my "choice" to believe that no > Leprechauns or fossilized remains of any Leprechauns have ever been > found on this planet. So, despite the lack of evidence, you could have chosen to believe in Leprechauns? Try it. Go on. Chose to believe in Leprechauns for 5 minutes. I bet you can't do it without laughing. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: Smiler on 16 Jul 2008 16:27 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:0c6c31a6-3a3b-4253-a1a5-c5240f4e9dcf(a)e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Jul 14, 10:08?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:b5c22ec1-f268-4a3c-add6-247b8ad8eb0b(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 13, 7:23?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >news:a151dbac-e47c-4e4f-a64a-94c34c1894d8(a)26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com... > > On Jul 13, 8:43?am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:49:43 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >On Jul 12, 8:25?am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:20:29 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> >A two year old is learning to lie or tell the truth. ?If a two > > > >> >year > > > >> >old sees its parents lie all the time, then the two year old is > > > >> >going > > > >> >to do the same thing. > > > > >> Ho-kayyyy - tell us please, because we'd love to know, how a > > > >> two-year-old can tell its parents are lying when it does not know > > > >> the > > > >> truth itself. Unless it's by watching the nose grow longer and > > > >> longer. > > > >A two year old is concerned about what works. ?If the two year old > > > >sees that lying is more effective in getting results than telling the > > > >truth, then that is what the two year old is going to start doing. > > > >Atheists generally reward untruth. > > > > Right, now just go back and read again, a bit slower this time. How > > > does the two-year-old know - from the example of his elders - that > > > lying is more effective, when - are you still there? - he does not > > > yeat recognise it as lying? > > > > Linda ff > > > In the beginning man created god in his own image- Hide quoted text - > > > What you are claiming is that a two year old cannot tell if something > > is true or untrue. ?I take the position that a two year old is just as > > capable of discerning as anyone, but might have more of a tendency to > > try to say the answer he believes his parent wants to hear. > > ============================================= > > How many children do you have? > > ?I do not have any children. ?I am not married. > =========================================== > So you have no experience of bringing up children and yet you think you > have > the right to tell others how to bring up their children. > I've never done any welding. Would you take my advice on how to weld? > Yes, I have the right to talk about whatever I choose to talk about here in America. ============================= But you've no right to be taken seriously and no right to be listened to, Skippy #2 ====================================== So you are saying it is different over there in Europe? =============================== Only slightly. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 16 Jul 2008 22:23 On Jul 17, 12:02 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 15, 12:57 am, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > On Jul 15, 3:58 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 14, 8:30�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:66e61aa9-559f-4671-a2ea-6bc1905bebe9(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Jul 13, 6:28?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:fc9d57b1-a5d8-4dea-b10c-2de186d77c39(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups..com... > > > > > On Jul 12, 5:43?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:43c4adf8-d379-4a72-815c-bc35c1c84eaf(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > On Jul 11, 5:04?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > >news:6ebcae55-3c20-4ea3-960e-25f802c31860(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jul 10, 8:51?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > >news:1b629e70-db18-4208-a3da-4381dcebabb4(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 8:45?pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There were some atheists who said Harry Potter went on the train > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > London to wizard's school. > > > > > > > > > > And once again, child, you have confused fiction with reality... > > > > > > > > > Harry Potter is fiction. ?The woman who wrote the books said it was > > > > > > > > fiction. ?I know this may come as a shock to atheists. > > > > > > > > =================================== > > > > > > > > > The bible is also fiction. We don't even know who wrote it. > > > > > > > > I know this may come as a shock to christians. > > > > > > > > Get over it. > > > > > > > > No, Smiler, the Bible tells about the construction of Hezekiah's > > > > > > > tunnel. ? Didn't we discuss this before. > > > > > > > ================================ > > > > > > > And the Harry Potter books tell us about Kings Cross station and > > > > > > > London. > > > > > > > Both the Harry Potter books and the bible are fiction. > > > > > > > Get over it. > > > > > > > > Smiler, > > > > > > > If you want to believe that the Bible is fiction, it seems to me that > > > > > > you are free to believe that the Bible is fiction. ?I will tell you > > > > > > what. ?Why don't you decide for yourself what you believe, and I will > > > > > > decide for myself what I believe? ?Does this seem unfair to you? > > > > > > ============================================== > > > > > > Not unfair if you keep your stupid beliefs out of a.a. > > > > > > > Smiler, > > > > > > The godless one > > > > > > a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the > > > > > header. > > > > > ==================================== > > > > > That won't stop your stupid comments from appearing in a.a., will it. > > > > > You take a.a. out of your header. > > > > > Think about it, Smiler. �I am not going to go to alt.atheism. �I have > > > > no interest in atheists. > > > > ============================ > > > > Then why do your lying posts appear in a.a., LIAR? > > > > > Smiler, > > > > The godless one > > > > a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Because you have not yet taken sci.physics and sci.physics relativity > > > out of the header. > > > Robert B. Winn > > > To remove your posts from alt.atheism, you would need to take a.a out > > of your headers. Us changing ours isn't going to change yours. > > Are you going to stop lying soon? > > > Al- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Well, you atheists were the ones who barged into sci.physics and > sci.physics.relativity. As I said before, I do not go to > alt.atheism. > Robert B. Winn Wrong. Mitch the two time Boggo award winning idiot started the cross posting, if I remember correctly. I place him in your camp. Then you waded into that discussion that was already cross-posted, while it was discussing biblical accuracy based on sales figures. It had nothing to do with physics, even though Mitch, the semi-christian idiot somehow thought it did. And no-one "goes to" a newsgroup. But by replying to messages in this topic with the alt.atheism tags still intact, you are posting to alt.atheism, which is then read by (surprise surprise) atheists. Al
From: Sanforized on 16 Jul 2008 22:33 Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) wrote: > On May 27, 5:35 pm, panamfl...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > >>On May 26, 9:20 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote: >> >> >>>No. I don't think so. >> >>Well, not if it isn't a neurotic megalomaniac. Problem is, most human >>"god" myths that claim it *is*. >> >> >>>"I want to know how God created this universe. All the rest are just >>>details." Albert Einstein >> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1951333/Einstein-thought-religions-we... >> >> >>>Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 >> >>Yeah, sure. And I'm World Driving Champion. >> > > > For that comment to be of the scale of Mitch's, you'd have to be a > blind amputee, with cerebral palsy and serious epilepsy who'd never > driven before. > But it is hard to be as wrong as Mitch. Even Mitch has to work at it.
From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) on 16 Jul 2008 22:38
On Jul 17, 4:42 am, Linda Fox <linda...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > wrote: > > > > >Well, you atheists were the ones who barged into sci.physics and > >sci.physics.relativity. As I said before, I do not go to > >alt.atheism. > > Nobody "barges in" when a thread gets cross-posted. I get this thread > through the Cambridge newsgroup cam.misc which is also in the header. > I was interested enough to look at it because I happen to be atheist, > but I'm not subscribed to a.a, yet I'm getting a thread which has > people on it from physics newsgroups. Now maybe I should accuse the > physicists of "barging into" cam.misc? I don't "go into" the physics > newsgroups any more than you "go into" alt.atheism (I mean, God knows, > or more precisely I'm sure TNP knows, I readily hold my hands up to > not understanding a word of them) > > Linda ff Oh, I was wondering what the cam.misc was. Not enough to bother looking it up, but wondered all the same :-) Welcome, to our little world of counter-trollism. Al |