Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Smiler on 1 Aug 2008 20:34 "rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:20f1e376-9a97-48d1-9da4-f7cf581dcafc(a)w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Aug 1, 4:39?am, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Jul 31, 1:11?pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > ============================ > > > All Christs are false, even the first one. > > > Well, I think that the best person to tell your idea would be Jesus > > Christ. ?Why don't you take some time to tell him what you think when > > he returns to judge the earth? > > Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Do you know that your mental illness is getting worse? > You have no way to explain when asked, then you avoid like a scared > dog losing its fight and ran with tail in between ?the legs.- Hide quoted > text - > > - Show quoted text - How did you come to this conclusion? ================================== We can all tell that you're as mad as a hatter and as thick as a housebrick without us having any qualifications in psychiatry. The evidence is in all your posts. ======================================== Were you aware that trying to practice psychiatry without a license is a felony? ================================== Show where is he PRACTISING psychiatry, skippy. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: Smiler on 1 Aug 2008 20:52 "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:6ffui3Fb4931U2(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message > news:UZvkk.130007$Eo3.48387(a)newsfe14.ams2... >> > > >> We may be (and I am) pro-choice, but none, AFAIK, are >> pro-abortion. >> > > Although we may be willing to make exceptions to this rule > for certain deserving individuals .... > I'm afraid we're 60+ years too late.... Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: Stan-O on 1 Aug 2008 22:15 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:28:28 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >> >> Anyone who will keep you from taking firearms and shooting at >> >> imaginary Satans, since you've already referred to a couple of people >> >> by that name... >> >> >I was not referring to people. ?I was referring to the evil spirit >> >that had possessed people. >> >> I feel sorry for any children that you have. You'd probably take them >> to an exorcist...- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >There is no reason for me to take anyone to an exorcist. Oh sure, you say that NOW! Wait until you get a face full of pea soup!
From: Stan-O on 1 Aug 2008 22:34 On 1 Aug 2008 14:03:57 -0700, Matthew Johnson <matthew_member(a)newsguy.org> wrote: >In article <kir6949o6ultktihc9isa7vimf11k3h5kh(a)4ax.com>, Stan-O says... > >[snip] > >>Don't try to figure it out. Robert's brain is one non-sequitor after >>another... > >Your own posts meet that description, too. After all: you are completely off >topic for sci.physics, cam.misc and alt.sci.physics. You are on topic only for >alt.atheism. If so, that makes you a fake because you are doing exactly the same thing. >And the term is "non sequitur", not "non sequitor"! If you can't spell Latin, >stop trying to impress the masses with Latin phrases you don't understand >yourself. It doesn't work! So, shoot me because I didn't hit the spell check when using the Latin phrase for an illogical statement or progression of statements...(Even if I have fat fingers, I still know what it means, so nya nya!) >And why are you cross posting to so many groups? Even if Robert posts to >sci.physics, you don't have to answer him here, you can refer him to your answer >in alt.atheism. I make you a deal...I'll KF him if you will...
From: Stan-O on 1 Aug 2008 22:35
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:33:55 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >> In Canada, that is considered hate speech. It doesn't matter if you >> live in another country. You posted this to an international news >> group and you'll be hearing from our lawyers and psychiatrists...- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >Yes, Canadians are such civilized people. I don't think I would want >to ride a Greyhound bus there, though. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, but coming from you, it isn't surprising... |