From: rbwinn on
On Aug 1, 5:16�pm, Matthew Johnson <matthew_mem...(a)newsguy.org> wrote:
> In article <cca0c2fa-98aa-446b-b2fc-0c027ef0d...(a)59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> rbwinn says...
>
> [snip]
>
> >> How do you 'KNOW' that ? There are plenty of Christians who baptize
> >> their babies ..... are you saying they won't get into heaven ? What
> >> 'special' knowledge do you possess that they don't ?
>
> >> --
> >Modern revelation.
> >Robert B. Winn
>
> And this, of course, is where Winn demonstrates a thoroughly broken,
> unscientific epistemology.
>
> To demonstrate how broken it is, how thoroughly useless both for science and
> theology, one only has to consider: what answer can he have is someone else pops
> up and claims to have a "modern revelation" that infant baptism is not only
> good, but a commandment from God?
>
> All he can do is complain that this other person is not following revelation
> from God after all. But wait! Why should we not say the very same about Winn?
> Who is really going to win this contest?
>
> That is yet another reason why none of his crossposts belong in sci.physics. He
> should have posted to alt.atheism only, and amused himself by watching the
> rattled cages there.

Well, I was discussing Einstein's theory of relativity until these
people came by. They are exactly like scientists in that respect.
They do not want to discuss the Galilean transformation equations. I
believe that the fastest way to get the subject back to relativity is
to answer all of their questions.
Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on
On Aug 1, 5:33�pm, Free Lunch <lu...(a)nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:38:28 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote
> in alt.atheism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 1, 2:46?am, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:04:53 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> Your goal posts move faster than the eye can follow, don't they?
> >> >> No-one made the claim that "There is Nothing in the bible that can be
> >> >> proven."
> >> >> Several people pointed out that just because there is a tunnel where
> >> >> the bible says there is a tunnel,doesnot mean that anything else it
> >> >> said (even about the tunnel) is true. ?Because we would expect the
> >> >> authors, (fiction authors or historians) to know about the tunnel back
> >> >> then. ?They may not have known where it came from though, so we can't
> >> >> trust their account of that until it has been established by other
> >> >> methods.
>
> >> >> Al- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >Well, I can trust their account. ?They were Jews, not atheists.
>
> >> Do you have to start every post with "Well"? It's quite annoying...- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Well, I don't have to, but I do. �If it annoys atheists, there must be
> >a reason. �I learned that pattern of speech from Ronald Reagan. �Just
> >look how successful Ronald Reagan was.
>
> Ronald Reagan was successful in deluding his followers. As a leader he
> was mediocre at best. In honesty, he earned failing grades. I can see
> why you would be proud to follow a liar.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, he always answered questions by starting with the word well.
Nobody got upset when Ronald Reagan did it. So why does it bother you
so much when I do it?
Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on
On Aug 1, 5:34�pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote:
> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:20f1e376-9a97-48d1-9da4-f7cf581dcafc(a)w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 1, 4:39?am, hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 31, 1:11?pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > > ============================
> > > > All Christs are false, even the first one.
>
> > > Well, I think that the best person to tell your idea would be Jesus
> > > Christ. ?Why don't you take some time to tell him what you think when
> > > he returns to judge the earth?
> > > Robert B. Winn- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Do you know that your mental illness is getting worse?
> > You have no way to explain when asked, then you avoid like a scared
> > dog losing its fight and ran with tail in between ?the legs.- Hide quoted
> > text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> How did you come to this conclusion?
> ==================================
> We can all tell that you're as mad as a hatter and as thick as a housebrick
> without us having any qualifications in psychiatry.
> The evidence is in all your posts.
> ========================================
>
> Were you aware that trying to
> practice psychiatry without a license is a felony?
> ==================================
> Show where is he PRACTISING psychiatry, skippy.
>
Any time that you declare a person insane you are practicing
psychiatry. What the law requires you to do is to go to a court and
submit a petition requesting the institutionalization of a person
believed to be insane.
Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on
On Aug 1, 7:15�pm, Stan-O <bndsna...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:28:28 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >> Anyone who will keep you from taking firearms and shooting at
> >> >> imaginary Satans, since you've already referred to a couple of people
> >> >> by that name...
>
> >> >I was not referring to people. ?I was referring to the evil spirit
> >> >that had possessed people.
>
> >> I feel sorry for any children that you have. You'd probably take them
> >> to an exorcist...- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >There is no reason for me to take anyone to an exorcist.
>
> Oh sure, you say that NOW! Wait until you get a face full of pea soup!

That would still not be a reason to take anyone to an exorcist.
Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on
On Aug 1, 7:26�pm, DanielSan <daniel...(a)speakeasy.net> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Aug 1, 6:47 am, Masked Avenger <cootey...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:

>
> >> Does Schr dinger's cat have 18 half lives ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Well, I could send you a copy of the Bible, and then you could decide
> > for yourself instead of just repeating what other atheists say.
>
> So, you think that MA hasn't read the Bible?
>
If he did, he did not understand what he read.
Robert B. Winn