From: jmfbahciv on 15 Nov 2006 07:28 In article <455A52EE.ED61DAAB(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote >> > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote >> >> >> >>> After my tuition and dorm fee were paid, I lived on $2/month when >> >>> I went to college; the $2 included clothes washing and Tampax. >> >> >> >>I defy you to feed yourself on $2 a week. I defy you to feed yourself, >> >>travel to and from work and afford work clothes on $2 a week. >> > >> > I defy you to think of ways to stop spending money. >> >> I can think of lots of ways. What does that have to do with what I said? You >> claim to have lived on $2 a month as an example of how people should be so >> happy to live on $200 per week. I say not only are you living in a mystical >> past of fifty years ago, but living on a wage of $200 per week in this day >> and age is far from easy. > >I wonder how she got health cover on $2 a month ! I didn't have it. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Nov 2006 07:29 In article <4559DA19.3B5B7EC8(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >And you like to imply things that just aren't true. You weren't living on >> >"$2/day". >> >> Right. It was $2/month. > >And you can also clean a whole house in 15 mins ? When I was well, I could clean mine in 15 minutes. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Nov 2006 07:31 In article <kgl6h.25069$TV3.20095(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4559DA19.3B5B7EC8(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>> >And you like to imply things that just aren't true. You weren't living >>> >on >>> >"$2/day". >>> >>> Right. It was $2/month. >> >> And you can also clean a whole house in 15 mins ? > >The thing that she conveniently glosses over I did not gloss over it. I assumed that you were able to think well enough to fill in those blanks. ARe you really that thinking disabled that I have to specifically spec out all aspects? I said college. It was already established the decade that occurred. I should have known better because you have shown in this thread that you cannot read two sentences and figure out how they relate. /BAH <snip> /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Nov 2006 07:34 In article <MPG.1fc3a41f97fa58d1989b32(a)news.individual.net>, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <ejce10$8ss_012(a)s858.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... >> In article <MPG.1fc192c87abdff5b989afb(a)news.individual.net>, >> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >> >In article <ej7ffd$8qk_042(a)s851.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... >> <snip> >> >> >> After my tuition and dorm fee were paid, I lived on $2/month when >> >> I went to college; the $2 included clothes washing and Tampax. >> > >> >That's harsh! I didn't need Tampax (but my wife did). Beer was >> >expensive though! ;-) >> >> I didn't drink then. I didn't think it was harsh. That's how >> we lived at home. >> > >> >BTW, we were both making a quarter above the minimum wage of >> >$2/hr.> >> >> You were rich. When I started saving for college, I was making >> $.65/hour. I thought I was very rich because before that >> I was making $.07/lb picking blueberries. Or a dollar a day >> babysitting brats. I dropped the babysitting; it wasn't worth >> the money. > >That was when I was a senior in college, working for the UNiversity >as an electronics technician. A week later I was making the grand >sum of $12,300/yr as an engineer. ;-) That's a lot of blueberries. > >I started college at $.10/hr under minimum wage ($1.50/hr) at the >same job (technician). Funny how that piece of paper makes things go up. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Nov 2006 07:37
In article <4559DA86.1FABF81E(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> I'm waiting until India and China figure out how to run clean rooms. > >No problem in China for sure. I haven't been there in a long time, but they probably still have a lot of ramping up to do w.r.t. training. > >India, well......... Do not underestimate these people. They've already figured out how acquire the equivalent of computer paper-pushing work. /BAH |