From: jmfbahciv on
In article <455A52EE.ED61DAAB(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>T Wake wrote:
>
>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote
>> > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote
>> >>
>> >>> After my tuition and dorm fee were paid, I lived on $2/month when
>> >>> I went to college; the $2 included clothes washing and Tampax.
>> >>
>> >>I defy you to feed yourself on $2 a week. I defy you to feed yourself,
>> >>travel to and from work and afford work clothes on $2 a week.
>> >
>> > I defy you to think of ways to stop spending money.
>>
>> I can think of lots of ways. What does that have to do with what I said?
You
>> claim to have lived on $2 a month as an example of how people should be so
>> happy to live on $200 per week. I say not only are you living in a mystical
>> past of fifty years ago, but living on a wage of $200 per week in this day
>> and age is far from easy.
>
>I wonder how she got health cover on $2 a month !

I didn't have it.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <4559DA19.3B5B7EC8(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> >And you like to imply things that just aren't true. You weren't living on
>> >"$2/day".
>>
>> Right. It was $2/month.
>
>And you can also clean a whole house in 15 mins ?

When I was well, I could clean mine in 15 minutes.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <kgl6h.25069$TV3.20095(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4559DA19.3B5B7EC8(a)hotmail.com...
>>
>>
>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >And you like to imply things that just aren't true. You weren't living
>>> >on
>>> >"$2/day".
>>>
>>> Right. It was $2/month.
>>
>> And you can also clean a whole house in 15 mins ?
>
>The thing that she conveniently glosses over

I did not gloss over it. I assumed that you were able to think
well enough to fill in those blanks. ARe you really that thinking
disabled that I have to specifically spec out all aspects?

I said college. It was already established the decade that
occurred. I should have known better because you have shown
in this thread that you cannot read two sentences and figure
out how they relate.

/BAH


<snip>

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <MPG.1fc3a41f97fa58d1989b32(a)news.individual.net>,
krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote:
>In article <ejce10$8ss_012(a)s858.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says...
>> In article <MPG.1fc192c87abdff5b989afb(a)news.individual.net>,
>> krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote:
>> >In article <ej7ffd$8qk_042(a)s851.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says...
>> <snip>
>>
>> >> After my tuition and dorm fee were paid, I lived on $2/month when
>> >> I went to college; the $2 included clothes washing and Tampax.
>> >
>> >That's harsh! I didn't need Tampax (but my wife did). Beer was
>> >expensive though! ;-)
>>
>> I didn't drink then. I didn't think it was harsh. That's how
>> we lived at home.
>> >
>> >BTW, we were both making a quarter above the minimum wage of
>> >$2/hr.>
>>
>> You were rich. When I started saving for college, I was making
>> $.65/hour. I thought I was very rich because before that
>> I was making $.07/lb picking blueberries. Or a dollar a day
>> babysitting brats. I dropped the babysitting; it wasn't worth
>> the money.
>
>That was when I was a senior in college, working for the UNiversity
>as an electronics technician. A week later I was making the grand
>sum of $12,300/yr as an engineer. ;-)

That's a lot of blueberries.

>
>I started college at $.10/hr under minimum wage ($1.50/hr) at the
>same job (technician).

Funny how that piece of paper makes things go up.

/BAH

From: jmfbahciv on
In article <4559DA86.1FABF81E(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> I'm waiting until India and China figure out how to run clean rooms.
>
>No problem in China for sure.

I haven't been there in a long time, but they probably still have
a lot of ramping up to do w.r.t. training.
>
>India, well.........

Do not underestimate these people. They've already figured out
how acquire the equivalent of computer paper-pushing work.

/BAH