From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 03:53 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > In article <45206C09.31550FBE(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > > >It depends on our behaviour - actually mainly that of the USA. Recent US behaviour has made it all > that > much more attractive. > > As I said, you're thinking way too small. And, too parochial. The > belief that other people are just reacting to what we do, not acting > on their own plans and ideas, is touching, but not anchored in > reality. It is a pleasant belief, no doubt, since it presents us with > the illusion of control, with the sense that ultimately all that's > happening depends only on what we do, thus we just have to find the > proper mode of behavior and everything will be great. A pleasant > illusion, but no more than this. You need to do some reading. OBL for example. Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 04:00 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > In article <45206C8B.5FBCA071(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> In article <45205B23.8190A32(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: > >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> > > >> >> The Islamic terrorists aim at destruction of the western society > >> > > >> >Where did you get that idea ? > >> > >> From their own writings. Try to keep informed. > > > >Idiot. > > > >You mean they only migrate here becasue they want to destroy us ? > > > I said "Islamic terrorists". I didn't say "all Muslims". You still > fail to understand the difference. Your assertion is still wrong. There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to have you believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 04:02 JoeBloe wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:38:39 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > > > For thirty years the British were > >terrorized by Irish Republicans, it was never called a "war. > > Then why did they call themselves the Irish Republican Army (IRA)? > HHHhhhhmmmmmm? The name dated from the earlier issue in the 20s and never went away. Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 04:03 JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:33:19 +0100, Eeyore Gave us: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > > > >> The US is not demonizing Islam, at this point. It makes the > >> distinction between Islam and Islamic extremism. > > > >I can assure you that many Americans don't understand the difference. > > You cannot assure any such thing, you presumptuous dope. Yes I can. Hech, some Americans can't even distinguish Sikhs from Muslims asa was shown shortly after 9/11 whena Sikh guy was attacked and killed in the USA for wearing unsuitable head gear ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 04:08
JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:23:00 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" Gave us: > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote > > > >>>But it isn't a war. It is a problem for a police force that requires > >>>international cooperation, something the US is notoriously unable or > >>>unwilling to be involved in. > > > >> I don't understand those words, "international cooperation." Where > >> might that be found? > > > >Outside of the USA. > > The Unite States gives away billions of dollars a year in aid The USA's aid donations are well below that of many other Western nations who aren't even as rich ! Furthermore, it's often accompanied by silly 'conditions'. The USA recently notably refused to co-operate in an internationally inspired aid plan to bring safe drinking water to communities worlwide. The USA should actually hang its head in shame. Graham |