From: Ken Smith on
In article <2p1Ug.16$45.152(a)news.uchicago.edu>,
<mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote:
[....]
>Well, here is at least one thing you can say for Al Queda. They are
>quite honest, no pretending.


Maybe, they are just more effective liars. If you haven't caught them in
a lie, it doesn't mean there weren't lies they got away with.

The whole idea that they have anything to do with any form of Islam may
well be a lie. They can get lots of cannonfodder from the Muslim world
may be the reason they try to appear Islamist. It may really be about
power and control.

--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Jim Thompson on
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 03:39:15 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>Jim Thompson wrote:
>>
>> That's where we pretend we like the French ;-)
>
>
> Sorry, Jim, but I'm not THAT good at playing pretend.

<snicker :->

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:45:18 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:23:18 -0700, Jim Thompson
><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:46:21 -0700, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:14:02 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
>>><nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:00c0i29vn31ejl71pku1d0r1nfaevj6p4i(a)4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>>>So you are saying they are NOT better Xtians than everyone else?
>>>>>>
>>>>> No, I'm saying that this war on terrorism started long before
>>>>> President Bush and the present Republican administration was
>>>>> involved in any way.
>>>>
>>>>But it isn't a war. It is a problem for a police force that requires
>>>>international cooperation, something the US is notoriously unable or
>>>>unwilling to be involved in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't understand those words, "international cooperation." Where
>>>might that be found?
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>
>>That's where we pretend we like the French ;-)
>>
>> ...Jim Thompson
>
>And the French pretend to have principles.
>
>John

<double snicker :->

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Ken Smith on
In article <c7WdncygLPPv3r3YRVnytQ(a)pipex.net>,
T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
[...]
>The western world bandies the term "war" around much too easily. (War on
>Terror, War on Drugs, War on Obesity etc.)

It is time for a war on the improper use of the term "war on".

--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Ken Smith on
In article <4311i2l8pj43dpasfo65k9e4gmp1200doi(a)4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:38:39 +0100, "T Wake"
><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>> For thirty years the British were
>>terrorized by Irish Republicans, it was never called a "war.
>
>
> Then why did they call themselves the Irish Republican Army (IRA)?
>HHHhhhhmmmmmm?

The British side did not call it a war and called the Irish side criminals
because that was to the advantage of the British. The Irish side called
themselves the IRA because getting the word "army" in there made it a
"war" and that was to their advantage. Terrorists call themselves
"freedom fighters".

In the current conflict, the US has opted to give the other side an early
victory by calling it a "war".

--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge