Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 05:13 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > In article <4520C734.BF44F5D0(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to have >you > believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. > > There wasn't such thing as a coherent "Axis" in 1939-40. There were > three separate nations, pursuing separate goals, often in > non-coordinated fashion, at times even in a way which was detrimental > to the other Axis members goals. Your fixation with the history of WW2 is idiotic. Graham
From: mmeron on 2 Oct 2006 05:19 In article <4520D7D9.63B69D7E(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> In article <4520C55D.7B2F988C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >> >> >You need to do some reading. OBL for example. >> >> I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite >> superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for >> starters. > >I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. Not Islam >generally. > I think I said quite specifically that I'm not talking about Islam in general, just some movements within it. Your attempt to create strawmen is noted and treated with the disdain it deserves. And, yes, you should read a bit regarding the Muslim Brotherhood. You may learn something. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: mmeron on 2 Oct 2006 05:20 In article <4520D844.DCF01BAD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> In article <4520C734.BF44F5D0(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >> >> >There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to have >you >> believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. >> >> There wasn't such thing as a coherent "Axis" in 1939-40. There were >> three separate nations, pursuing separate goals, often in >> non-coordinated fashion, at times even in a way which was detrimental >> to the other Axis members goals. > >Your fixation with the history of WW2 is idiotic. > I'll take this for a tacit admition that you've no better answer. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 05:25 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >> > >> >You need to do some reading. OBL for example. > >> > >> I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite > >> superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for > >> starters. > > > >I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. Not > >Islamgenerally. > > I think I said quite specifically that I'm not talking about Islam in > general, just some movements within it. There are several - no many - 'movements' and lumping tham all together as 'Islamic/Islamist terrorists' is hugely misleading. > Your attempt to create > strawmen is noted and treated with the disdain it deserves. And, yes, > you should read a bit regarding the Muslim Brotherhood. You may learn > something. I already have done you clot. Graham
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 05:27
mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > In article <4520D844.DCF01BAD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >> > >> >There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to >> >have > you believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. > >> > >> There wasn't such thing as a coherent "Axis" in 1939-40. There were > >> three separate nations, pursuing separate goals, often in > >> non-coordinated fashion, at times even in a way which was detrimental > >> to the other Axis members goals. > > > >Your fixation with the history of WW2 is idiotic. > > I'll take this for a tacit admition that you've no better answer. The history of WW2 has nothing useful to offer in the current context. In fact it's wholly misleading to use it as any kind of template. Graham |