Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: mmeron on 2 Oct 2006 05:28 In article <4520DB20.DDF6A811(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >You need to do some reading. OBL for example. >> >> >> >> I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite >> >> superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for >> >> starters. >> > >> >I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. Not >> >Islamgenerally. >> >> I think I said quite specifically that I'm not talking about Islam in >> general, just some movements within it. > >There are several - no many - 'movements' and lumping tham all together as 'Islamic/Islamist terrorists' is >hugely misleading. > I already answered this. You're repeating yourself. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: mmeron on 2 Oct 2006 05:37 In article <4520DB95.FA98E674(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> In article <4520D844.DCF01BAD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to >> >have >> you believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. >> >> >> >> There wasn't such thing as a coherent "Axis" in 1939-40. There were >> >> three separate nations, pursuing separate goals, often in >> >> non-coordinated fashion, at times even in a way which was detrimental >> >> to the other Axis members goals. >> > >> >Your fixation with the history of WW2 is idiotic. >> >> I'll take this for a tacit admition that you've no better answer. > >The history of WW2 has nothing useful to offer in the current context. In fact it's wholly misleading to use it as >any kind of template. > Aha. And this is based on, well, on your say so. Well, since I already determined to my satisfaction what you're, don't expect me to put to much of a weight on you opinions. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Oct 2006 04:42 In article <45206C37.EA6475DA(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> Western Europe wasn't interested in getting much involved in the >> anshluss, because it wasn't the target of Nazi expansionism. > >All of which has zilch to do with this. Your comment is an example of why history has to repeat itself. /BAH
From: mmeron on 2 Oct 2006 05:47 In article <efqje7$8ss_003(a)s821.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >In article <45206C37.EA6475DA(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >>> Western Europe wasn't interested in getting much involved in the >>> anshluss, because it wasn't the target of Nazi expansionism. >> >>All of which has zilch to do with this. > >Your comment is an example of why history has to repeat itself. > Yes, exactly. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
From: Eeyore on 2 Oct 2006 07:09
mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> >You need to do some reading. OBL for example. > >> >> > >> >> I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite > >> >> superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for > >> >> starters. > >> > > >> >I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. >> > NotIslam > generally. > >> > >> I think I said quite specifically that I'm not talking about Islam in > >> general, just some movements within it. > > > >There are several - no many - 'movements' and lumping tham all together as 'Islamic/Islamist > terrorists' is > hugely misleading. > > I already answered this. Not with any great clarity. > You're repeating yourself. So ? Graham |