From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >
> >>Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead
> >>of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need
> >>to measure before and after _plug-in_.
> >
> >
> > Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in !
>
> You display your ignorance. The background is measured.

After I hit send I realised I should have written "no product". I just knew an
idiot would complain.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments?
> >>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get
> >>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete.
> >>>>
> >>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw.
> >>>
> >>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ?
> >>
> >>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading.
> >
> >
> > That's what "device off" MEANS !
> >
> > Good Lord ! How daft are you ?
>
> LOL
>
> These days "device off" isn't really off.

It is when the power cord isn't plugged in you cretin.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


unsettled wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> >
> > It's not a nightmare [EMC compliance]. I should know, I'm the one dealing with it
> in > my work not you.
>
> You *should* know.

I *do* know.

Graham


From: Ken Smith on
In article <45C1F518.475EA010(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>So what. If a German comes to the UK and drives at 80MPH on the motorway
>> >>>he
>> >>>has broken the law and the police can take action.
>> >>
>> >> Only in specified cases can police take action. At the moment
>> >> I'm thinking about diplomatic immunity.
>> >>
>> >
>> >It is interesting you say "only in specified cases." What do you think are
>> >the specified cases where the police *can* take action. Please list them
>> >all.
>>
>> Read the extradition treaties. I don't know if there is a word
>> for the list of exceptions when one is working in an embassy.
>
>Embassies are treated as 'sovereign territory' of the host country IIRC.

You mean "guest" not "host". This is a case of overlapping laws. The
embassy, must comply with some of the host countries laws. The people
within it are considered to be in the guest countries domain.
--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Eeyore on


Ken Smith wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>So what. If a German comes to the UK and drives at 80MPH on the motorway
> >> >>>he
> >> >>>has broken the law and the police can take action.
> >> >>
> >> >> Only in specified cases can police take action. At the moment
> >> >> I'm thinking about diplomatic immunity.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >It is interesting you say "only in specified cases." What do you think are
> >> >the specified cases where the police *can* take action. Please list them
> >> >all.
> >>
> >> Read the extradition treaties. I don't know if there is a word
> >> for the list of exceptions when one is working in an embassy.
> >
> >Embassies are treated as 'sovereign territory' of the host country IIRC.
>
> You mean "guest" not "host".

Correct. Or "by the host country". One of those things that you notice just after
you hit send.

Graham