Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 1 Feb 2007 11:05 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > unsettled wrote: > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > > > >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? > > > >>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get > > > >>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw. > > > >>> > > > >>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ? > > > >> > > > >>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading. > > > > > > > > > > > > That's what "device off" MEANS ! > > > > > > > > Good Lord ! How daft are you ? > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > These days "device off" isn't really off. > > > > It is when the power cord isn't plugged in you cretin. > > Dumb donkey, that's what "unplugged" means. Wow, you are dense! The standards do not use the word 'unplugged'. Graham
From: Phil Carmody on 1 Feb 2007 11:45 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. > This included all of the infrastructure required. > The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody > has to do that work. It also includes the requirement that you think 6 is 3. BAH maths is BAD maths. It also presumes that Szil�rd, Teller, Einstein and Oppenheimer, had no knowledge before they started working on the projects. Weird, as Szil�rd was researching the matter at about the same time as the Erm�chtigungsgesetz was kicking in (but not publishing his work for that very reason). BAH history is BAD history. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: unsettled on 1 Feb 2007 12:30 An idiot named DumbDonkey splattered ascii that resembles: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead >>>>of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need >>>>to measure before and after _plug-in_. >>> >>> >>>Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in ! >> >>You display your ignorance. The background is measured. > > > After I hit send I realised I should have written "no product". I just knew an > idiot would complain. Crucial information is measured. This is a feeble attempt to cover up your stupidity.
From: unsettled on 1 Feb 2007 12:32 Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? >>>>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >>>>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw. >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ? >>>> >>>>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading. >>> >>> >>>That's what "device off" MEANS ! >>> >>>Good Lord ! How daft are you ? >> >>LOL >> >>These days "device off" isn't really off. > > > It is when the power cord isn't plugged in you cretin. That's called, as BAH properly called it, "not plugged in." "Device off" may have the power connected to the device, or it might not. Her point is valid, and as usual you're nothing more than a DumbDonkey.
From: unsettled on 1 Feb 2007 12:33
Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>It's not a nightmare [EMC compliance]. I should know, I'm the one dealing with it >> >>in > my work not you. >> >>You *should* know. > > > I *do* know. > Everything you've written proves you *don't* know. Carry on with your protests. |