Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:19 In article <a3f7a$45c48574$cdd08504$18440(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <pO6dnetrRIU_8l7YnZ2dneKdnZypnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:45C36DC1.B1B9226E(a)hotmail.com... >>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Pay attention to what happened in Boston yesterday; especially >>>>>>>follow what happens after this and what the critics are saying >>>>>>>and what these critics don't say. One thing you need to know >>>>>>>is that the mayor of Boston is the only politician here who >>>>>>>is taking the warnings of 9/11 seriously. >>>>>> >>>>>>Would you care to explain for us who don't live there >>>>>>what it is that happened in Boston ? >>>>> >>>>>It's too long to explain. Magic incantations are: gorilla marketing, >>>>>Turner Broadcasting; the Cartoon channel and some movie about >>>>>hair (I haven't figured this one out yet); Boston temporarily >>>>>shut down. >>>> >>>>Completely failing as ever to say the word bomb and hoax. >>>> >>>>I've heard elsewhere about this now. The police in Boston acted correctly. >>>>I >>>>hope whatever nitiwit thought this one up goes to jail. >>> >>>To be honest, I have no idea how this incident in Boston shows the Mayor >>>there is the "only politician [there] who is taking the warnings of [11 Sep] >>>seriously." >> >> >> Everybody, according to the mayor's report, worked together and got >> to the disaster center on time. The bomb squad did their job well. >> The mayor was on the radio every morning and evening keeping us >> uptodate. The shutdown was done efficiently. The startup was >> not a problem (other than the usual snarls). They must have >> shut the city starting from the outside in. I didn't hear >> many awful traffic reports. The mayor has done his homework >> establishing an infrastructure for the times when messes will >> happen. >> >> Note that he was accused of overreacting. Also the news said >> that the marketing firm told the guys setup those things to >> not say anything. It took over a half day for anybody on the Turner >> side to call the mayor and tell him it was a publicity stunt. >> >> >> Most politicians around here say the word "9/11" followed by a "but". > >What is clear is that any improvised device showing >batteries and wires is presently suspicious to the >police. That's got the potential to shut down cities >and airports. Leaving a large ghetto blaster at Logan >Airport would probably shut down the building it was >found in. Did the plane that fell on Scotland have a radio filled with explosive? > >As usual, the police are the last to ramp up to understand >technology. It took them a long time to come to grips with >computers and the internet. It is taking them too long >to come to grips with simpler "devices". I don't know. The conclusion I had was all people have to do is put a cartoon on the outside and Poof!. > >What's obvious is that they need to send some of their >brightest to as-yet-undesigned seminars to learn what >constitutes a threat, and what doesn't. Figuring out if those things were bombs or not is the bomb squad's job. That's what they did. >In the meantime >they don't dare to take a chance about anything that >looks suspicious. Even so, they should have some inkling >of what sort of passive volume a device needs to have >in order to contain explosive in a deadly quantity. It doesn't need to be deadly. All needs is to have enough oomph to break one key part of a piece of large structure. Note where these guys put those things. > >In this case police ignorance was expensive. I don't think it was, in the long run. We'll see--only time will tell. One of the talking experts that news media relies on, said something about being surprised that Turner could approve such a thing. I had the opposite opinion. /BAH /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:24 In article <45C36FC0.9975B959(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Rationing continued after the war btw. >> >> >> >> I know. That is another point of evidence that England couldn't >> >> shake the socialist type of governing. >> > >> >It has zilch to do with socialism and everything to do with a shortage of >> >food you nitwit. >> >> There wasn't a shortage after the war was done. > >Yes there was. > > >> >Did you know that health actually improved during the period of rationing btw >> >? >> >> Do those stats exclude everybody who died from bombs and bullets? >> > >I said *health*. Do you not understand ? Yes. I understood. I also understand that stats can be misinterpreted. You moved a large part of your population from the cities to the countryside. That might also have more to do with *health* than your implication that a government controlling your food purchasing creates healthier conditions. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:25 In article <45C37018.10BD636(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the >> >> wiring of the plug of the radio? >> > >> >You clearly don't understand how RF energy propagates. It doesn't matter >> >which circuit it's on. >> >> Exactly. And it can't be the house wiring. > >Of course it can be. Then explain why I did have the same effects with the stove that was replaced. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:26 In article <ksp7s25msr8da10g2ld0dd8n6qfe4jiq9t(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Fri, 02 Feb 07 15:20:42 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>In article <45C3495D.93DE0786(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the >>>> wiring of the plug of the radio? >>> >>>You clearly don't understand how RF energy propagates. It doesn't matter >>which >>>circuit it's on. >> >>Exactly. And it can't be the house wiring. > > You're an idiot. You proved that when you stated that you are >plugging a stove into a pigtail. So what do you call it? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:29
In article <45C37833.3475050F(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in perpetual motion >> >> >> >> devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Habishi isn't American. >> >> >> >> >> >> And he got his training in England. >> >> > >> >> >Do you have any evidence for this ? >> >> >> >> He said so. >> > >> >When was this ? >> > >> >> Best estimate is about two years before Franz Heymann died. > >You talk in riddles as ever. > >I suppose it was too much to expect you to name a year and some context ? I gave you an estimate of the year. Franz and I were trying to get habshi to test his ideas. That's when habshi told where he went to school. I can't recall the name of the school-- Cambridge is what pops up but I can't say if that's the right one. /BAH |