Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:08 In article <ncp7s21pvj0848cp5256mnj30eh6gqv0qg(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Fri, 02 Feb 07 14:32:20 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >> >>Powered off is not the same as unplugged. > > You're an idiot. Test benches have power supplies to power circuits >so that they do not require their internal AC fed power supply. All >the circuits of your petty little stove would have been tested before >even being assembled into the stove. If the stove was not tested after assembly, the procedures have another bug. > >> No matter how you want >>to squirm, > > You're a goddamned RETARD. > >> techs would read 'powered off' in the procedures and >>just hit the power button, > > Yes. The power button of the TEST BENCH, removing ALL POWER from the >DUT (Device Under Test). > > You could be more clueless, just not in this life. > >> then take the base-line measurement. > > You wouldn't even know what the word meant if your twit companion in >life hadn't explained it to you. Huh? /BAH
From: Phil Carmody on 3 Feb 2007 08:16 unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > Phil Carmody wrote: > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > > > >>Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. > >>I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world > >>history. > > Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs did he > > attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) > > You're expected to come to these discussions with at > least a rudimentary knowledge of history. I do. It's just that your master seems to be hopping around between tangentially related topics. I'm simply wondering what thing she is referring to in this one. If it's what I'm thinking of, it means she's hopped topic again. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: Phil Carmody on 3 Feb 2007 08:17 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > In article <87lkjggic8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > >> Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. > >> I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world > >> history. > > > >Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs > >did he attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) > > When Saddam tried to annex Kuwait. That's what I assumed. You do realise that you've just brought up another example that weakens your own argument from about half a dozen posts back? Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:11 In article <45C379D1.F60802F4(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Pay attention to what happened in Boston yesterday; especially >> >> >> follow what happens after this and what the critics are saying >> >> >> and what these critics don't say. One thing you need to know >> >> >> is that the mayor of Boston is the only politician here who >> >> >> is taking the warnings of 9/11 seriously. >> >> > >> >> >Would you care to explain for us who don't live there >> >> >what it is that happened in Boston ? >> >> >> >> It's too long to explain. Magic incantations are: gorilla marketing, >> >> Turner Broadcasting; the Cartoon channel and some movie about >> >> hair (I haven't figured this one out yet); Boston temporarily >> >> shut down. >> > >> > Completely failing as ever to say the word bomb and hoax. >> > >> > I've heard elsewhere about this now. The police in Boston acted correctly. >> > I hope whatever nitiwit thought this one up goes to jail. >> >> To be honest, I have no idea how this incident in Boston shows the Mayor >> there is the "only politician [there] who is taking the warnings of [11 Sep] >> seriously." > >Several other cities also had the 'suspicious devices' planted yet no action was >taken about them. >http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/01/31/mass_suspi cious_devices_called_a_hoax/ That supports my statement that only a few politicians are taking this threat seriously. /BAH
From: unsettled on 3 Feb 2007 08:26
Phil Carmody wrote: > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > >>Phil Carmody wrote: >> >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >>> >>> >>>>Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. >>>>I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world >>>>history. >>> >>>Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs did he >>>attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) >> >>You're expected to come to these discussions with at >>least a rudimentary knowledge of history. > > > I do. Obviously not. |