Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:46 In article <mgo7s21ckoee6om4d5c05vj9rr8pjfi78h(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Fri, 02 Feb 07 14:04:45 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>In article <8e65s297p2fs3tfodc3mk1rmqu2phstukv(a)4ax.com>, >> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>On Thu, 01 Feb 07 12:46:52 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>> >>>>It isn't the burners. It is the computer board in the stove that >>>>is bad. >>> >>> The stove has a clock, a cooking timer, and maybe some thermal probe >>>monitoring ports. That isn't a computer. >> >>It has one board. > > > Which incorporates all the items I listed above. Being a single >board STILL does NOT make it a computer. > > Nice attempt at a sidestep, though. You have the term "computer" and "computer system" confused. They are not equivalent terms. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 08:49 In article <87d54rfki2.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> In article <87lkjggic8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> >> Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. >> >> I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world >> >> history. >> > >> >Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs >> >did he attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) >> >> When Saddam tried to annex Kuwait. > >That's what I assumed. You do realise that you've just brought >up another example that weakens your own argument from about >half a dozen posts back? I'm sure all kinds of facts contradict each other in this case. It is a complicated issue and isn't going to be solved with a STOP, RESET, RESTART procedure. It's also clear that this group, who keep trying to prove me wrong, doesn't have any idea how these Muslims live, think or believe. You are making conclusions based on zero knowledge. /BAH
From: Phil Carmody on 3 Feb 2007 10:04 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > In article <87d54rfki2.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > >> In article <87lkjggic8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > >> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > >> >> Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. > >> >> I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world > >> >> history. > >> > > >> >Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs > >> >did he attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) > >> > >> When Saddam tried to annex Kuwait. > > > >That's what I assumed. You do realise that you've just brought > >up another example that weakens your own argument from about > >half a dozen posts back? > > I'm sure all kinds of facts contradict each other in this case. Unfortunately, you're hoarding the lion's share. > It is a complicated issue and isn't going to be solved with a > STOP, RESET, RESTART procedure. It's also clear that this group, > who keep trying to prove me wrong, doesn't have any idea how > these Muslims live, think or believe. You are making conclusions > based on zero knowledge. In this thread, I do make conclusions from your posts. As you said... Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Feb 2007 10:28 In article <87veije0z8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> In article <87d54rfki2.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> >> In article <87lkjggic8.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, >> >> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> >> >> Saddam broke a long tradition which was Arab didn't attack Arab. >> >> >> I think this is going to be viewed as a crucial point in world >> >> >> history. >> >> > >> >> >Which event are you referring to here? Which particular Arabs >> >> >did he attack and when? (It's not obvious from the context.) >> >> >> >> When Saddam tried to annex Kuwait. >> > >> >That's what I assumed. You do realise that you've just brought >> >up another example that weakens your own argument from about >> >half a dozen posts back? >> >> I'm sure all kinds of facts contradict each other in this case. > >Unfortunately, you're hoarding the lion's share. > >> It is a complicated issue and isn't going to be solved with a >> STOP, RESET, RESTART procedure. It's also clear that this group, >> who keep trying to prove me wrong, doesn't have any idea how >> these Muslims live, think or believe. You are making conclusions >> based on zero knowledge. > >In this thread, I do make conclusions from your posts. Once in while, I wish you would make one before you negate the contents of my words. /BAH
From: Tony Lance on 3 Feb 2007 10:43
Big Bertha Thing Halfrail Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/halfrail.html Access page JPG 22K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.gardening Detail in photgraph of a model of Track on the Bottom Monorail Half. Caption;- Schilowsky's Monorail Car. Extract from Chapter V;- 73. Another ingenious application of the gyroscope to a monorail car has lately (Feb., 1914) been made by Monsieur Schilowsky, a Russian inventor..... So far as experiments have gone at present the weight of the gyroscope is designed to be something between 1/10th and 1/25th of the whole weight of the car, while the two pendulums together are about 1/3rd of the weight of the gyroscope. The author is indebted to M. Schilosky both for the diagrams and the photograph from which plate IV has been made. A model of the car has been presented by the inventor to the Science Museum at South Kensington and can be viewed by the public at anytime. An article on this monorail is to be found in the issue of The Engineer for January 23, 1914. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing handbook 1. Handbook thread one posting long. 2. Correctly attributed. 3. Professional. 4. Steet savvy. 5. Well read. 6. Appropriate. 7. Source softly spoken. 8. Solitary. 9. More Sesame Street than Darth Vader. 10. Optional, optimal and optical. Tony Lance judemarie(a)bigberthathing.co.uk |