Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 3 Feb 2007 11:50 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eq22n6$8qk_005(a)s939.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45C37833.3475050F(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in >>> >> >> >message >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in perpetual > motion >>> >> >> >> devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ? >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >Habishi isn't American. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> And he got his training in England. >>> >> > >>> >> >Do you have any evidence for this ? >>> >> >>> >> He said so. >>> > >>> >When was this ? >>> > >>> >>> Best estimate is about two years before Franz Heymann died. >> >>You talk in riddles as ever. >> >>I suppose it was too much to expect you to name a year and some context ? > > I gave you an estimate of the year. Franz and I were trying > to get habshi to test his ideas. That's when habshi told > where he went to school. I can't recall the name of the school-- > Cambridge is what pops up but I can't say if that's the right one. He was lying.
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:09 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > >>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>> > >>>>You people sure seem to have to think in absolutes. > >>> > >>> Like you and your stove. > >> > >>I would have been superstitious about the stove, except another > >>bit god I know can't use his modem when his stove is plugged in. > >> > > > > If he is on a modem, he is hardly anything even close to a "bit god". > > Then you've never met one. His assesment sounds spot on to me. Graham
From: Ken Smith on 3 Feb 2007 12:11 In article <epvkjc$8qk_004(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >In article <epqdem$lk3$14(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: [.....] >>Oh good now you admit that there are moderates and exteremists. > >This is more smoke and mirrors. I do not lump moderates and >extremists together; you appear to have done this by assuming >that, when I talk about extremists, I'm also talking >about moderates. You need to go back and read your posts from a while back. You did indeed lump them together. It seems that at this point you have studied up a little. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:16 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > I've figured out how it could have happened. Given the > additional fact that the tech, whom the stove guy called, > also said that nobody listens to AM radio anymore, is another > strong indication that my conclusion is a good one. Nope. The standards measure from 150kHz up. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:17
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Trying to explain the restrictions of the sale would > be impossible. That's why the standards exist. Graham |