From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 13:02 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:47:23 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:33:19 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> > >> >> The US is not demonizing Islam, at this point. It makes the >> >> distinction between Islam and Islamic extremism. >> > >> >I can assure you that many Americans don't understand the difference. >> >> How many is "many"? Seven? If "many" means "a significant fraction", >> then you are, as usual, inventing anti-American "facts." > >The majority who post on Usenet for sure ! > >It seems to me that the US War on Terror has simply created a new kind of >hostile racism or culture'ism of a sort. --- Understandably so, since it threatens terrorists and terrorist sympathizers, for whom you seem to be a leading advocate. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 13:06 On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:00:52 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > >> In article <45206C8B.5FBCA071(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >> In article <45205B23.8190A32(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: >> >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> The Islamic terrorists aim at destruction of the western society >> >> > >> >> >Where did you get that idea ? >> >> >> >> From their own writings. Try to keep informed. >> > >> >Idiot. >> > >> >You mean they only migrate here becasue they want to destroy us ? >> > >> I said "Islamic terrorists". I didn't say "all Muslims". You still >> fail to understand the difference. > >Your assertion is still wrong. > >There is no such thing as a coherent 'Islamic terrorist' movement, much as the USA would like to have you >believe it. Much Islamic terrorism isn't even targeted at the West. --- So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: lucasea on 2 Oct 2006 13:05 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45213D8F.71ED9BA2(a)hotmail.com... > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> > >> > Heading down the road of philosophical arguments now, but would it be >> > possible to "win" a war on crime? >> >> Yep, all it takes is a "Mission Accomplished" banner, and you too can >> declare victory in your favorite war on x...and here's the best >> part...without actually having to accomplish anything. > > There's already been one of those and I don't think the public were fooled > for > long. Uhh...that was the point of my satire. Eric Lucas
From: Dirk Van de moortel on 2 Oct 2006 13:06 "Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message news:ZQPoDusYBUIFFwME(a)baesystems.com... > In message <IRpTg.104052$jf1.1156126(a)phobos.telenet-ops.be>, Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel(a)ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> > writes >> >>"martin griffith" <mart_in_medina(a)yahoo.esXXX> wrote in message news:ge7rh2dhhptpsilekktnd9svbtdirpq2lb(a)4ax.com... >>> On 29 Sep 2006 09:06:40 -0700, in sci.electronics.design >>> science_for_jihad(a)yahoo.com wrote: >>> >>>>Jihad needs competent scientists in the fields of nuclear physics, >>>>chemistry and biology. Qualified scientists and engineers at the >>>>Master/Ph.D. level and above are encouraged to apply. Readiness to >>>>travel and to pass a preliminary examination is required. >>>> >>>>Anyone interested should send his anonymous CV to the address >>>>science_for_jihad(a)yahoo.com . The CV should contain information >>>>reflecting the academic level reached by the candidate and his work >>>>experience. The information however should not be so accurate as to >>>>identify the candidate. An appropriately fantasious nickname and a >>>>birth date corresponding to the approximate age of the candidate should >>>>also be provided, together with a working email address. Further >>>>instructions will follow. >>> >>> Hey, nice spoof, any suggestions on fantasious nick names? >> >>Hadji Maharadji? > > A Hindu who's been to Mecca? Yep, backward. Dirk Vdm
From: John Fields on 2 Oct 2006 13:14
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:08:21 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >JoeBloe wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:23:00 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" Gave us: >> >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote >> > >> >>>But it isn't a war. It is a problem for a police force that requires >> >>>international cooperation, something the US is notoriously unable or >> >>>unwilling to be involved in. >> > >> >> I don't understand those words, "international cooperation." Where >> >> might that be found? >> > >> >Outside of the USA. >> >> The Unite States gives away billions of dollars a year in aid > >The USA's aid donations are well below that of many other Western nations who >aren't even as rich ! --- That's because we don't like to feed the hand that bites us. --- >Furthermore, it's often accompanied by silly 'conditions'. --- Yeah, like: "If we give you this money will you promise to use it to feed your people and not to make weapons with it?" --- >The USA recently notably refused to co-operate in an internationally inspired >aid plan to bring safe drinking water to communities worlwide. --- Must've been a cockamamie plan. --- >The USA should actually hang its head in shame. --- You'd love that, wouldn't you, pissant? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |