Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 13:09 T Wake wrote: > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote > > > and the average American heard nothing about it, > > So that makes it OK then? I seem to recall one of his debating pals said "silence implies consent" ! Graham
From: T Wake on 3 Oct 2006 13:09 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:nfq3i21ho617f25tnndifm0hlhpmo5onul(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:58:29 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax > <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Gordon wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:47:08 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> John Fields wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:59:42 +0100, "T Wake" wrote: >>>>>> "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it >>>>>>> would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Whose goal? "It" isn't really appropriate to define the long term >>>>>> aims of a >>>>>> disparate group of organisations. Are "they" trying to dominate the >>>>>> world or >>>>>> destroy western society or convert every one or... >>>>> --- >>>>> "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to >>>>> convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by >>>>> Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. >>>>> >>>>> Refusal to convert would result in death. >>>> Do you often conjure up such idiotic ideas out of thin air ? >>>> >>>> Graham >>>> >>> Graham, what John said is straight out of their Koran. Repeated >>> in many Surah, Ayah passages. For example; >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Surah 47, Ayah 4 When ye encounter the infidels, strike of their >>> heads till ye have made a great slaughter among them, and of the >>> rest make fast the fetters. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> For the record, an infidel is anyone who is not a recognized >>> Muslim in good standing. A Muslim who turns away from the Muslim >>> religion is an infidel. Any person who belongs to and >>> acknowledges belonging to any other religion is an infidel. >>> >>> Gordon >> >>Then how do you account for Iran having the second highest Jewish >>population in the ME? According to your theory they should all be >>Muslims or dead by now. > > --- > They are "People of the Book" and deserve respect. > As are Christians. Gordon did say "For the record, an infidel is anyone who is not a recognized Muslim in good standing." This implies that Jews, Christians, Hindus etc are all subject to the beheading.
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 13:13 Jim Thompson wrote: > "The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your > tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's > yelling, 'You want a piece of me?'" ? Robin Williams. I can see how that would appeal to your violent nature. Graham
From: T Wake on 3 Oct 2006 13:13 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:61u2i2pirp98lghk6samgbgfq4f9ria646(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:05:11 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Larkin wrote: >> >>> Graham has a pathological and mostly irrational hatred of America, >> >>Not at all. I am however intruiged how Americancs invariably bring out the >>hate word the very second even the tiniest >>criticism is voiced against them. >> >>It's not hate at all, more like despair at the crass stupidity of your >>governmemnt and the ppl who elected them. >> >> >>> and makes up things to support that need. >> >>Simply no need ever to do that ! >> >> >>> So naturally he doesn't like to >>> be reminded about stuff like WWII or the Cold War. He believes that >>> the UK and Russia defeated Germany with little need for US assistance. >> >>The USA was around 3 years late to the party of course. I have little >>doubt that Russia would have eventually defeated >>Germany anyway. Germany could certainly never ever have defeated Russia, >>the numbers simply aren't even remotely >>credible. > > --- > That's all Monday morning quarterbacking but, if as you say, had > Russia defeated Germany without the US being involved do you think > that you'd still be speaking English as a first language? And that isn't Monday morning quarterbacking?
From: T Wake on 3 Oct 2006 13:14
<mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:VdgUg.35$45.83(a)news.uchicago.edu... > In article <qrWdndqvubGlpLzYnZ2dnUVZ8tednZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> writes: >> >><mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote in message >>news:jUZTg.9$45.98(a)news.uchicago.edu... >>> In article <45205B23.8190A32(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Islamic terrorists aim at destruction of the western society >>>> >>>>Where did you get that idea ? >>>> >>> From their own writings. Try to keep informed. >> >>Which writings are they? >> >>Which Islamic Terrorist movement are you referring to? Or do you lump them >>all in as one? Are you able to see the difference between terrorist >>organisations? >> >>Is the "war" on terror a war against all terrorist organisations or just >>the >>Islamic ones which have targeted the US? >> >> > Answers: > > 1) See my replies to Graham. > 2) All of them. I assume the US are going to Occupy Belfast to stomp out the RIRA threat then? |