Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 3 Oct 2006 11:15 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:22:58 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:01:40 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:11:54 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >> >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >> >> In article <4520C55D.7B2F988C(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >You need to do some reading. OBL for example. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite >> >> >> superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for >> >> >> starters. >> >> > >> >> >I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. >> >Not >> Islam generally. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Probably _you_ should be afraid. I don't think they've forgotten >> >> the Crusades yet. >> > >> >Afraid of what exactly ? >> >> --- >> Convert or die. > >What gives you the utterly fuckwitted idea I'd ever be in such a position ? --- I see. There's _absolutely_ no chance you'd _ever_ have to make that decision? How comforting it must be to live in that ignorance-induced fantasy world of yours. --- >Moslems only account for a tiny percentage of the population if you hadn't noticed. --- Your arrogance will be your undoing. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:19 John Fields wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:47:08 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:59:42 +0100, "T Wake" wrote: > >> >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message > >> >> > >> >> So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it > >> >> would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose. > >> > > >> > > >> >Whose goal? "It" isn't really appropriate to define the long term aims of a > >> >disparate group of organisations. Are "they" trying to dominate the world or > >> >destroy western society or convert every one or... > >> > >> --- > >> "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to > >> convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by > >> Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. > >> > >> Refusal to convert would result in death. > > > >Do you often conjure up such idiotic ideas out of thin air ? > > --- > LOL, it's clear that you can't see past the end of your nose, nor > are you a student of history. There is no possibilty ever of Islam being forced on any of us. You're a stupendously cretinous fool to even imagine it. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:21 John Larkin wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:12:32 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >John Larkin wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:00:32 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >> >John Larkin wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I read about a recent experiment that was done in the UK. In response > >> >> to advertised job openings, good but fake resumes were invented and > >> >> sent in, with the only difference that some had English-sounding names > >> >> and some had Muslim-sounding names. The response ratio was about 5:1. > >> > > >> >I suspect this is another urban myth actually. A similar thing was *really* > >> >done with different ages in fact. > >> > >> It's in here... > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Muslim#Islamophobia_in_Europe > > > >" he asks whether Muslims will be the victims of the next pogroms " > > > >See my post on this point. > > > >That's why I laugh when American try lecturing us about being blind to the danger > >from Islam. Do you guys seriously think we'd ever let them get the upper hand ? > > > >Graham > > Upper hand? What does Europe plan to do about the exponents of > population growth, negative for the traditional population and > positive for Islamic immigrants? So, you're worried about a hypothetical something in maybe 1000 yrs ? Has it ever ocurred to you that most European Muslims don't want to live like backward tribesppl ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:22 John Larkin wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:38:54 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote: > > >More and more like the Soviets every day! > > Don't get your panties in a bunch. It's actually more like 1930s Germaany. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 11:25
John Larkin wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:38:55 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote: > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote > > > >> The issue is whether non-US-citizens have Constitutional rights when > >> they are not physically in the USA, or whether US citizens have such > >> rights when captured in a foreign country while fighting against our > >> military. > > > >The US believes that US law applies everywhere in the world, but US > >constitutional rights don't apply to anyone who isn't the 'right sort of > >person'. > > Preposterous. He's perfectly right. The 'Natwest 3' were extradited to the USA from the UK for a supposed 'crime' that doesn't even exist in UK law and that alleged 'crime' took place on UK soil. This UK Gov't has a lot to answer for for agreeing to an extradition treaty that your lot haven't even signed and doubtless wouldn't accept the conditions of were the situations reversed. Bunch of damn cowboys. Graham |