NEWS: FBI wants records kept of Web sites visited
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Broadcom Adds Bluetooth 3.0, Wi-Fi Direct to Android
Next: NEWS: Sprint 4Q Loss Narrows,Pre-Paid Growth Falls Short
From: Jerry Peters on 12 Feb 2010 16:50 In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:09:57 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> > wrote in <6KmdneZtLPWrHenWnZ2dnUVZ_qNi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: > >>In article <4au8n51ecv1aa21tgg246m49n2t8itjlil(a)4ax.com>, >> John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:18:18 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> >>> wrote in <fbmdnY3mwsSG6enWnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d(a)earthlink.com>: > >>> > There is absolutely no correlation between money spent on education >>> >and outcomes. ... >>> >>> Patently not true. >> >> Patently true. Look at the stats. > > Been there; done that. If you reduce funding to zero, then outcomes > would most definitely change. In short, patently not true. > Reductio ad absurdum. Certainly no one is advocating reducing funding to 0. The point is that *increasing* funding does not necessarily increase educational outcomes. Jerry
From: Jerry Peters on 12 Feb 2010 16:52 In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:26:19 -0600, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> > wrote in <s87bn5tftiose7j8if8dl0dvbjp6d9m9br(a)4ax.com>: > >>On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:14:15 -0800, John Navas >><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >>>Unfortunately that would come at the expense of more productive economic >>>activity -- TANSTAAFL. Much the same logic is behind state-sponsored >>>gambling, which is mostly a tax on the poor, and thus beloved of more >>>well-to-do conservatives. >> >>Total hogwash, but I know better than to engage in a discussion with >>you, so go ahead by yourself. > > In other words, you have nothing persuasive to say in rebuttal. > No John, you don't listen to the rebuttals. Jerry
From: John Navas on 12 Feb 2010 17:12 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:50:04 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters <jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in <hl4iec$eep$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:09:57 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> >> wrote in <6KmdneZtLPWrHenWnZ2dnUVZ_qNi4p2d(a)earthlink.com>: >> >>>In article <4au8n51ecv1aa21tgg246m49n2t8itjlil(a)4ax.com>, >>> John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:18:18 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> >>>> wrote in <fbmdnY3mwsSG6enWnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d(a)earthlink.com>: >> >>>> > There is absolutely no correlation between money spent on education >>>> >and outcomes. ... >>>> >>>> Patently not true. >>> >>> Patently true. Look at the stats. >> >> Been there; done that. If you reduce funding to zero, then outcomes >> would most definitely change. In short, patently not true. >> >Reductio ad absurdum. >Certainly no one is advocating reducing funding to 0. Quite a few people actually are. They call it privatizing. >The point is >that *increasing* funding does not necessarily increase educational >outcomes. Of course not, but that statement is quite different from "absolutely no correlation between money spent on education and outcomes". "Stay on target, Luke, stay on target!" ;) -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: John Navas on 12 Feb 2010 17:13 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:52:59 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters <jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in <hl4ijr$eep$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:26:19 -0600, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> >> wrote in <s87bn5tftiose7j8if8dl0dvbjp6d9m9br(a)4ax.com>: >> >>>On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:14:15 -0800, John Navas >>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>>>Unfortunately that would come at the expense of more productive economic >>>>activity -- TANSTAAFL. Much the same logic is behind state-sponsored >>>>gambling, which is mostly a tax on the poor, and thus beloved of more >>>>well-to-do conservatives. >>> >>>Total hogwash, but I know better than to engage in a discussion with >>>you, so go ahead by yourself. >> >> In other words, you have nothing persuasive to say in rebuttal. >> >No John, you don't listen to the rebuttals. No Jerry, I'm just not impressed by unsupported claims. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: Char Jackson on 12 Feb 2010 17:21
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:13:20 -0800, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:52:59 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters ><jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in ><hl4ijr$eep$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>: > >>In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:26:19 -0600, Char Jackson <none(a)none.invalid> >>> wrote in <s87bn5tftiose7j8if8dl0dvbjp6d9m9br(a)4ax.com>: >>> >>>>On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:14:15 -0800, John Navas >>>><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>Unfortunately that would come at the expense of more productive economic >>>>>activity -- TANSTAAFL. Much the same logic is behind state-sponsored >>>>>gambling, which is mostly a tax on the poor, and thus beloved of more >>>>>well-to-do conservatives. >>>> >>>>Total hogwash, but I know better than to engage in a discussion with >>>>you, so go ahead by yourself. >>> >>> In other words, you have nothing persuasive to say in rebuttal. >>> >>No John, you don't listen to the rebuttals. > >No Jerry, I'm just not impressed by unsupported claims. Waitaminute, the king of unsupported claims isn't impressed by unsupported claims? I'm shocked, but I guess you make an exception when it comes to yourself. (See above) |