NEWS: FBI wants records kept of Web sites visited
in [Wireless Internet]
|
Prev: NEWS: Broadcom Adds Bluetooth 3.0, Wi-Fi Direct to Android
Next: NEWS: Sprint 4Q Loss Narrows,Pre-Paid Growth Falls Short
From: John Navas on 13 Feb 2010 21:21 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:17:21 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters <jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in <hl74t1$rg$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> Of course not, but that statement is quite different from "absolutely no >> correlation between money spent on education and outcomes". >> >> "Stay on target, Luke, stay on target!" ;) >> >Ah, a nitpicker. On the contrary. >Use some intelligence John, stop being a jackass. You should take your own advice, Jerry. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: John Navas on 13 Feb 2010 21:23 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters <jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in <hl753v$rg$3(a)news.eternal-september.org>: >John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> No Jerry, I'm just not impressed by unsupported claims. > >Like the ones you consistently making? Pretty much everything posted here is just opinion, nothing more. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: Kurt Ullman on 13 Feb 2010 21:40 In article <sdnen5hkq3u4njd127gftj4tatc2lo2fjq(a)navasgroup.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > > I've already refuted it with an authoritative unbiased study. > You're very biased Dan. Is that available on the Net. I haven't been able to find it on Google. I have concerns about the definition of "shortfalls in spending" before I can say it refutes or is authoritative. -- I get off on '57 Chevys I get off on screamin' guitars --Eric Clapton
From: John Navas on 13 Feb 2010 21:48 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:40:36 -0500, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in <pJydnQtXdeU4_-rWnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>: >In article <sdnen5hkq3u4njd127gftj4tatc2lo2fjq(a)navasgroup.com>, > John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> I've already refuted it with an authoritative unbiased study. >> You're very biased Dan. > Is that available on the Net. I haven't been able to find it on >Google. I have concerns about the definition of "shortfalls in >spending" before I can say it refutes or is authoritative. I don't know. -- Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us> John FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>
From: DanS on 14 Feb 2010 07:41
John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in news:sdnen5hkq3u4njd127gftj4tatc2lo2fjq(a)navasgroup.com: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:19:04 +0000 (UTC), Jerry Peters > <jerry(a)example.invalid> wrote in > <hl7508$rg$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>: > >>In alt.internet.wireless John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> >>wrote: >>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:11:18 -0600, DanS >>> <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t(a)r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in >>> <Xns9D1D9A8B836B6thisnthatroadrunnern(a)216.196.97.131>: >>> >>>>John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in >>>>news:cfbbn5lqvivpgsvsgrhju4fpj6mvfhvi8q(a)4ax.com: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:15:26 -0600, DanS >>>>> <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t(a)r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in >>>>> <Xns9D1D911281D9Fthisnthatroadrunnern(a)216.196.97.131>: >>>>> >>>>>>John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in >>>>>>news:7v3bn5t7fthb9ckdthtog0lf2080lb979f(a)4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>>> And in fact there have been many such studies; e.g., "Examining >>>>>>> the Relationship between Educational Outcomes and Gaps in >>>>>>> Funding: An Extension of the New York Adequacy Study" [Peabody >>>>>>> Journal of Education, v81 n2 p1-32 2006]: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We find that for a majority of districts significantly higher >>>>>>> levels of spending are required if the state wishes to >>>>>>> provide a sound basic education to all public school >>>>>>> students. FURTHERMORE, THE RESULTS SHOW A CLEAR NEGATIVE >>>>>>> RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DISTRICT-LEVEL SHORTFALL IN SPENDING >>>>>>> AND EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES ACROSS VIRTUALLY ALL STUDENT >>>>>>> SUBPOPULATIONS. [emphasis added] >>>>> >>>>>>Yep...and here's another one that counters your study.... >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.heritage.org/research/Education/bg2179.cfm >>>>>>[SNIP] >>>>> >>>>> The Heritage Foundation is a conservative think tank. >>>>> You'll have to do a lot better than that. >>>> >>>>So just because you don't like the source, you discard it ? >>> >>> I discard it because it's biased. >> >>No, you can't refute it so you call it "biased". You're very >>transparent John. > > I've already refuted it with an authoritative unbiased study. Actually, you've refuted it with one sentence cut & pasted from *one* report that *you* say is unbiased and authoritative, that is not available for anyone else to read. > You're very biased Dan. Me ? Is that your version of the pot ? I'd call it biased for you to dismiss the Heritage Foundation strictly based on where it's from. You didn't cite any content, or why you think it was biased, it was just dismissed because of where it came from. Your right Navas, I concede, you are the all-knowing, all-seeing trash heap. |