From: Jim on 14 Jul 2010 10:44 Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> wrote: <snip> If you're going to insist on sparring with him then please take it to email. But be advised that he has mental health issues that make it apparently impossible for him to appreciate other people's point of view, and he'll see mortal insults where none have been offered. It doesn't matter if you try to refute his absurd claims of being insulted - in fact it just makes matters worse. I'm speaking as one who know the futility of arguing with him. Don't go there, it's a complete waste of time. Ignore him. Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Sara on 14 Jul 2010 11:06 In article <1jlmm2g.4b4qdr5y9mm4N%jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>, jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) wrote: > Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> wrote: > > <snip> > > If you're going to insist on sparring with him then please take it to > email. But be advised that he has mental health issues that make it > apparently impossible for him to appreciate other people's point of > view, and he'll see mortal insults where none have been offered. It > doesn't matter if you try to refute his absurd claims of being insulted > - in fact it just makes matters worse. > > I'm speaking as one who know the futility of arguing with him. Don't go > there, it's a complete waste of time. Ignore him. > ....please. -- Sara Run out of ideas for a sig for the moment
From: Rowland McDonnell on 14 Jul 2010 16:49 Sara <saramerriman(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) wrote: > > > Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > If you're going to insist on sparring with him then please take it to > > email. But be advised that he has mental health issues that make it > > apparently impossible for him to appreciate other people's point of > > view, and he'll see mortal insults where none have been offered. It > > doesn't matter if you try to refute his absurd claims of being insulted > > - in fact it just makes matters worse. > > > > I'm speaking as one who know the futility of arguing with him. Don't go > > there, it's a complete waste of time. Ignore him. > > > ...please. And please how about all of you actually doing that, eh? Why all this insistence on hurling personal remarks about me around this newsgroup? I really do not understand it. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: JM on 15 Jul 2010 05:05 > We ... have no creative talent in this country. Eh? Let's just have a look at the development of hospital diagnostic equipment. CT, MRI and ultrasound are all UK inventions. That, you might think, would have put us ahead of the game and resulted in the UK cornering a fair chunk of the world market. Today, our share of the diagnostic industry is miniscule. Why? Perhaps it's because, in the UK, we have rather too much "creative talent" in the financial sector. PS. Ditto the various apologies for you-know-who already offered.
From: John DoH on 15 Jul 2010 06:09
In article <1jln37f.1wqgt2y1h024ytN%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid>, real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) wrote: > Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > > > Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > If you're going to insist on sparring with him then please take it to > > email. But be advised that he has mental health issues that make it > > apparently impossible for him to appreciate other people's point of > > view, > > <cough> But that's untrue and rather insulting, Jim. > > >and he'll see mortal insults where none have been offered. > > That is also untrue, Jim - you've insulted me with your highly abusive > claims above, and you know you were being abusive. > > >It > > doesn't matter if you try to refute his absurd claims of being insulted > > - in fact it just makes matters worse. > > Well, what *YOU* do is angrily harangue me and insult me even more, > don't you? As you are doing now. > > > I'm speaking as one who know the futility of arguing with him. Don't go > > there, it's a complete waste of time. Ignore him. > > So why did you leap in to insult me, Jim? > > Rowland. The email has been doing the rounds, you are being killfiled, I know that is an alien concept to you, but Jim and his cronies see you (or rather don't at the moment) as persona non grata. Don't worry Rowland there are plenty of us who will stick up for your right to spout bollocks. -- "Telling someone to kill themselves is not harmful: it's merely me expressing an opinion. You try to drive people to suicide - that's evil. My behaviour is perfectly okay; your behaviour is evil - plain and simple evil." Rowland McDonnell - 9th. Mar. 2009 |