Never realized the Brits had such a terrible secret weapon (Rowland)
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Mark Conrad on 16 Jul 2010 01:53 In article <aac10db0-b934-42f2-9cb4-e35765897e66(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, JM <jm(a)dmu.ac.uk> wrote: > > We ... have no creative talent in this country. > > Eh? Let's just have a look at the development of hospital diagnostic > equipment. CT, MRI and ultrasound are all UK inventions. That, you > might think, would have put us ahead of the game and resulted in the > UK cornering a fair chunk of the world market. Today, our share of the > diagnostic industry is miniscule. Why? Perhaps it's because, in the > UK, we have rather too much "creative talent" in the financial sector. Well I for one want to thank you profusely for those inventions, they do a heck of a lot of good over here in the colonies. The USA is presently ranked #1 among all nations by the money we spend on MRI machines. I assume that money goes directly to the people who manufacture those MRI machines, under license from the inventors. Hopefully the inventors arranged things so they would reap a fair share of financial return from their invention. If not, like you say, perhaps they would have better off cornering the entire manufacturing end of things, keeping it in the UK ? Mark-
From: Tim Squeaker on 16 Jul 2010 12:46 On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:01:29 +0100, Woody squeaked: > Sorry, that is how I view you. I can't imagine what you are like in real > life, I can only go on what you are like here (and your stories of > having a go at policement, people from liverpool, petrol station > attendants, random other women) for examples of your normal day to day > interaction. He's much worse in real life according to his mate Sarah Balfour. She would know because she stayed at Rowland's house on several occasions. Rowland has said he doesn't like people or the human race. Case closed. -- "I don't much like people. Or the human race." Rowland McDonnell - Hates People - February 1, 2010
From: Mark Conrad on 16 Jul 2010 19:16 In article <1jlq92k.fjqmp02fvyc1N%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid>, Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Mr Conrad's opinions do not concern me in the slightest. > He cannot see the truth any more reliably than you can. What truth can't I see, Rowland ? Or is this just another one of your lies, like the lie you posted about me supposedly being the first one among us two people, the FIRST ONE to engage in PERSONAL insults, when everyone can see all our posts from the beginning in the thread named: " Any Physicians Using Macs" ....and observe these FIRST nasty personal attacks you made on me. Here is your lie in your own words: "You're the one who's launched the gratuitous personal abuse, not me." This all started with YOUR 16.8 KB post on 7/5/2010 in the thread "Any Physicians Using Macs? " Up to then, our posts had been quite civil, no _personal_ insults either way. Here again, to refresh your conveniently flawed memory, are the VERY FIRST personal attacks you made on me, when I had never made any similar personal attacks on you: Your exact words to me on that day: "So you're a propangandist for the Republican party - you're not welcome in my home, I can tell you." "Oh, so you ARE a neo-Nazi racist bigot? Only neo-Nazi racist bigots use that kind of language." "Yeahyeah - and now you think that the state's run by Communist Muslims, so I think we can ignore your opinions as pure malicious bullshit." Mark- -- Sorry Sara and Jim, I can not put up with Rowland's lies. He will be held to account for his lies by me, each and every time he lies about me, with actual details of his lie, in his own words.
From: Mark Conrad on 17 Jul 2010 00:01 In article <1jlogls.agidziuxkx8mN%real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid>, Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote the following to Jim jim(a)magrathea.plus.com > You've just insulted me badly - > and, by the way, so did Mark Conrad. Yes I did insult you goodly _AFTER_ you previously insulted me in another thread named "Any Physicians Using Macs? " This is known as "payback" Rowland, if you insult me first, which you did, then I insult you later, which I did. Here again are you very first insults to me, in your own words, in your 16.8 KB post on 7/5/2010 in the thread "Any Physicians Using Macs? " Your exact words to me on that day: "So you're a propangandist for the Republican party - you're not welcome in my home, I can tell you." "Oh, so you ARE a neo-Nazi racist bigot? Only neo-Nazi racist bigots use that kind of language." "Yeahyeah - and now you think that the state's run by Communist Muslims, so I think we can ignore your opinions as pure malicious bullshit." Those insults of yours to me eleven days ago are the reason that I insulted you in return, Rowland. I have a long memory, Rowland, and I intend to keep rubbing your nose in those _FIRST_ insults to me, every time you imply that I insulted you without cause. So far I have overlooked the great mass of "nearly personal" insults which you also heaped on me, long before I heaped similar "nearly personal" insults upon you. The time frame is important, Rowland. If you dump on me first, you can count on me dumping on you later. Mark-
From: Pd on 17 Jul 2010 09:14
Mark Conrad <aeiou(a)mostly.invalid> wrote: > If you dump on me first, > you can count on me dumping on you later. Oh god, another "you started it, I'm only doing to you what you did to me, I know you are but what am I, you can dish it out but you can't take it" playground mentality. Proof of the adage; everyone grows old, not everyone gains maturity. -- Pd |