From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:22:03 GMT, Rich Grise <rich(a)example.net> wrote:

>On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:19:12 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:03:49 -0000, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>...
>>>BTW, here's a wild idea breakthrough: A piston engine of 4 cycles is
>>>about as mechanically inefficient of an IC enigne as it gets, and the
>>>burning of a mostly N2 atmosphere is every bit as dumbfounded physics on
>>>steroids as it gets, and the last time I'd checked that's no conspiracy
>>>theory.
>>
>> Piston engines haven't changes fundamentally in 100 years, despite lots of
>> challenges from turbines, Sterling monstrosities, various weird rotary
>> engines, steam, fuel cells, whatever. That's pretty impressive. Still
>> pistons, rings, cranks, cams, poppet valves, spark plugs.
>
>I've heard that someone has even tried electric valves, but it didn't
>fly for some reason.
>

I think they're coming back.

John

From: Eeyore on


John Larkin wrote:

> So your obsession isn't aluminum, it's H2O2? Wild.

The guy is a complete wack job.

Graahm

From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:49:48 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sep 24, 11:26 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>> BradGuthwrote:
>> > Eeyore wrote:
>>
>> > > In any case your 'numbers' must be wrong. It barely requires high-school grade maths to show
>> > > that your ideas are completely INSANE.
>>
>> > > The most important fact is that H2O2 doesn't improve 'mpg'. In fact (taking the total energy
>> > > burden of manufacturing it) it degrades it.
>>
>> > Your insurmountable naysayism is noted.
>>
>> What I have stated are insurmountable FACTS !
>
>Your "insurmountable FACTS" are fully supported by your ExxonMobil
>partners in crimes against humanity, and they do very much thank you
>from the very bottoms of their little sooty black hearts.

Conspiracy theory. Goofy inventions always end in a conspiracy theory.

John

From: Jim Thompson on
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:06:17 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:49:48 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sep 24, 11:26 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>> BradGuthwrote:
>>> > Eeyore wrote:
>>>
>>> > > In any case your 'numbers' must be wrong. It barely requires high-school grade maths to show
>>> > > that your ideas are completely INSANE.
>>>
>>> > > The most important fact is that H2O2 doesn't improve 'mpg'. In fact (taking the total energy
>>> > > burden of manufacturing it) it degrades it.
>>>
>>> > Your insurmountable naysayism is noted.
>>>
>>> What I have stated are insurmountable FACTS !
>>
>>Your "insurmountable FACTS" are fully supported by your ExxonMobil
>>partners in crimes against humanity, and they do very much thank you
>>from the very bottoms of their little sooty black hearts.
>
>Conspiracy theory. Goofy inventions always end in a conspiracy theory.
>
>John

Methinks BradGuth is the fairy persona of Fred Bloggs ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
is that good men do nothing.
-Edmund Burke
From: Robert Adsett on
In article <1190652840.452812.163130(a)r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth says...
> What is it about spare/surplus clean energy that you do not
> understand?
>
> Perhaps you need to speak with wizard Willie Moo, or simply address
> the 65,000 teraWatts of solar energy influx that's mostly (99.9999%)
> going to waste, or that of the Earth/moon energy of 2e20 joules that's
> equally 99.9999999% or greater ignored and/or wasted.

Going to waste? It's maintaining life on this planet, something I'm
rather attached to myself.

Robert

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com