The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 19 Sep 2007 20:08 John Larkin wrote: > > Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually > work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against > raving lunatics. Don't forget the drooling idiots! They deserve irrational prejudice just as much as the raving lunatics. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: BradGuth on 20 Sep 2007 14:05 On Sep 19, 2:10 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > > Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually > work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against > raving lunatics. > > John And your all-knowing profound naysayism of your applied technology- fuckology is based upon what sort of conditional laws of physics? What other if any liquid fueled and assuming atmospheric breathing ICE is capable of zero NOx and otherwise minimal CO2? What other method of consuming fossil or whatever biofuel is ever going to give a fully loaded hybrid Hummer of any atmospheric consumption that 100 empg, without such having to drag along a multi- mile extension cord? - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 20 Sep 2007 14:16 On Sep 19, 5:08 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > John Larkin wrote: > > > Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually > > work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against > > raving lunatics. > > Don't forget the drooling idiots! They deserve irrational prejudice > just as much as the raving lunatics. And your warm and fuzzy swarm borg like collective fart of such all- knowing profound naysayism via your anti-think-tank worth of applied technology-fuckology is based upon what sort of conditional laws of physics? What other if any liquid fueled and assuming atmospheric N2 breathing ICE (excluding your intellectual flatulence powered alternative) is capable of getting the most empg at zero NOx and otherwise minimal CO2? What other method of consuming fossil or whatever biofuel is ever going to give such a fully loaded hybrid Hummer of any atmospheric consumption of mostly polluted N2 that kind of 100 empg, without such spewing NOx, CO2 and/or having to drag along that multi-mile extension cord? - Brad Guth -
From: John Larkin on 20 Sep 2007 14:48 On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:05:07 -0000, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 19, 2:10 pm, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >> Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually >> work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against >> raving lunatics. >> >> John > >And your all-knowing profound naysayism of your applied technology- >fuckology is based upon what sort of conditional laws of physics? > >What other if any liquid fueled and assuming atmospheric breathing ICE >is capable of zero NOx and otherwise minimal CO2? > >What other method of consuming fossil or whatever biofuel is ever >going to give a fully loaded hybrid Hummer of any atmospheric >consumption that 100 empg, without such having to drag along a multi- >mile extension cord? When your 100 MPG hummer is actually in the showrooms, we'll all owe you a great apology. Meanwhile, please go away. John
From: Rich Grise on 20 Sep 2007 18:57
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:05:07 +0000, BradGuth wrote: > On Sep 19, 2:10 pm, John Larkin >> >> Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually >> work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against >> raving lunatics. > > And your all-knowing profound naysayism of your applied technology- > fuckology is based upon what sort of conditional laws of physics? Well, there's conservation of energy, for one, but I've never heard that it was conditional. Hmmmmm..... Good Luck! Rich |