The Electric Car
in [Design]
|
From: BradGuth on 22 Sep 2007 19:06 On Sep 22, 1:29 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics, > > although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200 > > empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot > > end-user is going to require some degree of luck. > > The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening. > > Graham Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and only status quo norm. Some of us are sharing about getting the most clean and best possible empg per given volume or mass of fossil fuel, such as for using that fossil fuel along with h2o2 instead of badly burning our polluted atmosphere that's mostly N2. What the naysay puck on a stick are you thinking of? - Brad Guth -
From: Eeyore on 22 Sep 2007 20:26 BradGuth wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > BradGuth wrote: > > > Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics, > > > although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200 > > > empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot > > > end-user is going to require some degree of luck. > > > > The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening. > > > Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise > being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and > only status quo norm. I suggest you find out the frontal area and drag coefficient of a Hummer, plus its weight and rolling resistance. If you had the ability to do the required 'sums' I'm sure you'll find that the power required to propel it under a typical driving regime will never allow '100 mpg' or its equivalent. Ditto for 200 mpg and the Volt. Graham
From: Jim Thompson on 22 Sep 2007 20:48 On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:06:46 -0000, BradGuth <bradguth(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 22, 1:29 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> >wrote: >> BradGuth wrote: >> > Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics, >> > although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200 >> > empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot >> > end-user is going to require some degree of luck. >> >> The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening. >> >> Graham > >Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise >being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and >only status quo norm. > >Some of us are sharing about getting the most clean and best possible >empg per given volume or mass of fossil fuel, such as for using that >fossil fuel along with h2o2 instead of badly burning our polluted >atmosphere that's mostly N2. What the naysay puck on a stick are you >thinking of? >- Brad Guth - Methinks Brad proves that ignorance IS an excuse. ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
From: BradGuth on 23 Sep 2007 16:25 On Sep 22, 5:48 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)My- Web-Site.com> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:06:46 -0000,BradGuth<bradg...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Sep 22, 1:29 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> > >wrote: > >>BradGuthwrote: > >> > Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics, > >> > although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200 > >> > empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot > >> > end-user is going to require some degree of luck. > > >> The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening. > > >> Graham > > >Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise > >being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and > >only status quo norm. > > >Some of us are sharing about getting the most clean and best possible > >empg per given volume or mass of fossil fuel, such as for using that > >fossil fuel along with h2o2 instead of badly burning our polluted > >atmosphere that's mostly N2. What the naysay puck on a stick are you > >thinking of? > >- Brad Guth - > > Methinks Brad proves that ignorance IS an excuse. Methinks you're another brown-noed minion of the Third Reich, or perhaps of something far worse since you folks continually claim to know all there is to know, and then some. - Brad Guth -
From: BradGuth on 23 Sep 2007 17:14
On Sep 22, 5:26 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > BradGuthwrote: > > Eeyore wrote: > > >BradGuthwrote: > > > > Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics, > > > > although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200 > > > > empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot > > > > end-user is going to require some degree of luck. > > > > The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening. > > > Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise > > being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and > > only status quo norm. > > I suggest you find out the frontal area and drag coefficient of a Hummer, plus its > weight and rolling resistance. > > If you had the ability to do the required 'sums' I'm sure you'll find that the power > required to propel it under a typical driving regime will never allow '100 mpg' or its > equivalent. Ditto for 200 mpg and the Volt. Double ditto right back at you, as I've been there and done that. Of course double-duh, as it's hybrid city or local commute empg, and having replaced our mostly N2 atmosphere with that robust fluid of h2o2, so that we obtain the most clean energy per gallon of whatever fossil or biofuel is actually accomplished. I believe the mass ratio is something like roughly 7:1 up to 7.2:1 for h2o2/c12h26 (hydrogen peroxide / kerosene or RP-1), a little better on certain heavier fuel oil and perhaps nearly good enough with plain old gasoline, though worse off with certain biofuels, though all dual fuel injected and 100% computer controlled (of course), so that your little zero NOx engine for that hybrid Hummer or GM Volt can safely mix and match to almost any combination of fossil and biofuels. http://www.dunnspace.com/alternate_ssto_propellants.htm We're also talking about a fairly small radial turbine or some other rotary engine that's driving a direct coupled high speed alternator. I suppose you've got those insurmountable problems with that as well. What's your sorry excuse for being such an all-knowing naysay stick in the mud? - Brad Guth - |