From: RogerN on 30 Mar 2010 18:56 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.261c19c0bffcb83598972f(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <i_CdnXJaJYdp7i_WnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... > >> >> When Moses was doing the work God called him to do, the Egyptians found >> natural scientific explanations for the plagues of Moses. So don't be >> suprised that there are natural explanations for what God does, that's >> how >> it happened even back in the days of Moses. But they ignored the fact >> that >> Moses would not have known of the natural things that would happen. In >> other words, if God uses natural processes, it doesn't mean that it isn't >> God doing the work. Another example is the walls of Jericho, there is a >> fault line and an earthquake caused the walls to fall, but God knew >> precisely how to set up a hair trigger for the earthquake so that a shout >> would trigger it. A natural occurance set up at the hand of God, perhaps >> evolution is the same way. >> >> RogerN > > > Something that acts like that is not worthy of being called God. > > > -- > D from BC > British Columbia According to you, that's ok, I need fuel to roast my smores! RogerN OK, to be a little nicer, you don't know the process before God judged them. For example, those in Jericho ignored God for 40 years, how long did they need? Do you think they would have turned to God in 41 years? 42? How many? How about never? God's not on my side, just sometimes hopefully I'm on his side. RogerN
From: RogerN on 30 Mar 2010 18:58 "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message news:MPG.261bd98d80dd189b989729(a)209.197.12.12... > In article <P6-dnZrBv_GGRCzWnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > regor(a)midwest.net says... >> >> "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message >> news:MPG.261b13c0a41db4f8989720(a)209.197.12.12... >> > Are you saying that death by Spanish Inquisition, Crusades and witch >> > hunts were ok because there's so much more death throughout history? >> >> Nope >> >> > Do you realize the reasoning you're using can be used to tone down any >> > atrocity. >> > >> >> I can't answer for what anyone else did or does, but I have seen over and >> over Atheists blaming the majority of deaths on religion and it's simply >> a >> lie. So, what's the true tally? Something like deaths from Atheism 95%, >> deaths from religion 5%? >> >> RogerN > > Is this going to make you believe atheists are evil blood thirsty > psychopathic killers that would be happy in watching Christians suffer > in Christian death camps using environmentally friendly solar power? > > Here's an interesting video with visuals of Christianity + Nazi history. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvmsieqUyOo > > What wars do you know of that 'Death to Christians' was the sole > motivator for war? > Nope, as usual, wrong again. Maybe you should stick to power supplies? How bout batteries, are they too complex for you? RogerN
From: RogerN on 30 Mar 2010 19:01 "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote in message news:dcfadf1e-05fe-4e38-8cd3-b3fdeef99e3c(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Mar 30, 5:40 am, "David L. Jones" <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > D from BC wrote: > > mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... > > Time for another mega-troll. > > > Are Christian beliefs in conflict with good electronics engineering? > > There appears to be no evidence that delusion and electronics design > ability > are mutually exclusive. / /Jim Thompson believes in the Republicans. That's pretty much the same /level of silliness. / /-- /Bill Sloman, Nijmegen Republicans are right more often than Democrats. If we had the Democrats way, Obama would be a slave, OK, bad example. RogerN
From: krw on 30 Mar 2010 19:13 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:53:17 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <ncu4r550btdhkjio7i8i08l84q4i9foshr(a)4ax.com>, >jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... >> >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0700, D from BC >> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <rm63r55t9mn4c33emhbu2j67i0nlr0o1db(a)4ax.com>, >> >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... >> >> >> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:43:38 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >So the reason why you have faith in God is because you use faith for >> >> >other things? >> >> >> >> >> >> Use faith? >> >> >> >> Yer an idiot. >> >> >> >> The faith is that there is a creator. All the "religions" of Earth >> >> follow that rule. Some have more than one "god" or "creator". >> >> >> >> We have only ONE. >> > >> >Larkin claims that we commonly operate on faith. >> >For example... >> >He has faith his food doesn't contain E. Coli. That's because he has no >> >evidence that his food is good or bad. But he eats his food on faith >> >that it's safe. >> >No evidence = faith >> >Since faith is believing without evidence and many actions are done >> >without evidence then faith is justified which makes God justified. >> >If I got that right, that's his reasoning for why God exists. >> > >> >Sound messed up? >> >> I never claimed that God exists. I did claim that you're a >> mean-spirited idiot, for which there is concrete evidence. >> >> John > >If you have faith in God? How do you stop yourself from having faith in >every improbable thing? You don't read, do you. >I think you should get digging.. There could be a buried UFO in your >backyard. Idiot.
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 19:19
Roger... Larkin has faith in God but wrote recently that he makes no claim that God exists. Does he believe in God or not? Is he just wishing for a God? Or is his believing in God/Jesus for a ticket to heaven. And.. What are your reasons as to why there's a God? Just following the herd? Just believing fantastic stories in one book? Just like the music in church? -- D from BC British Columbia |