From: John Larkin on 30 Mar 2010 19:41 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:26:26 -0500, "RogerN" <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote: > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >news:a524r51rn73jjudigj69jkd5et7tqorrjo(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:41:56 -0700, Mr.Eko >> <ekointhedirt(a)lostisland.org> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:02:57 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>If I got this right... >>>>The reason why you believe in God is because it works for those that >>>>believe in God. >>>>uhh.. That's too ambiguous for me.. >>>>I'm understanding that as: The reason why you believe in God is because >>>>others believe in God. >>>>Correct? >>> >>> >>> It appears that you have never had a beautiful, wonderful, early >>>morning, early spring walk through a flowering Western US desert or >>>Eastern US woodland. >>> >>> That would be a mere two of the reasons why an observer of such wonders >>>becomes certain that it is the result of creation. >> >> It's not certainty to me, but it's sure suspicious that Earth is such >> an improbably beautiful place, and that we are alive now. The >> probability of those things happening is so close to zero that it >> doesn't matter. >> >> Consider living near the triple point of water: clouds, rivers, snow, >> all at the same time. >> >> Consider the neatly separated minerals for the taking, and the >> fuel/oxidizer in abundance. Consider the clear atmosphere, dense >> enough for flight but clear enough that we can see the stars. >> >> I bet D from BC is unimpressed. >> >> John > >It takes more faith to believe D from BC is an electronics designer, doesn't >it? :-) Sorry, I can't bring myself to that level of belief. > >I've heard a lot of people say they asked God that if he exists to let them >know and somehow or other God revealed himself to them. It didn't come that >easy for me, I desparately searched for God for days that turned into weeks, >but I did find evidences enough, and in abundance, to believe in God. > >You hear today stuff like "follow the money" claiming religion is only about >the money, and it's hard to argue with because in many instances it is true. >But at one time, to be a believer in Jesus meant probable death. You have >to get past the TV preachers and those who are in it for the money, you have >to get one on one with God. Most of the disciples were killed because of >their faith in Jesus, if anyone would know the truth, they would, and they >were willing to hold to their faith even though it cost their life. If it >were false, they wouldn't have been willing to die for something they knew >was a lie. > >A Romanian missionary that spoke at our church on several occasions walked >out of then communist Romania by following a pillar of light. On multiple >occasions this guy was picked up by the KGB and beaten because he was a >servant of God, he paid the penalty to be a believer, that's the kind of >person God moves for to deliver. > >Jesus was who he was and did what he did, but he gave his power to those who >believe in him. Read Acts, the disciples were able to do what Jesus did, >just like Jesus promised in the Gospel according to John. > >So, you have the Bible foretelling and foreshadowing Jesus a long time >before he came, then you have Jesus that came and fulfilled the prophesies >about himself, then the disciples that died because they told about Jesus, >and many martyrs since. Or you can believe this dipsh*t called DfromBC that >does good to turn on a flashlight and is incapable of much of anything else. >Sorry D, is your first name Dipsh*t? > >RogerN > We should be charitable towards him. He is clearly useless and messed up, and posts this drivel so that real people will take notice of him. John
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 19:43 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:01:14 -0500, "RogerN" <regor(a)midwest.net> wrote: > >"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote in message >news:dcfadf1e-05fe-4e38-8cd3-b3fdeef99e3c(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... >On Mar 30, 5:40 am, "David L. Jones" <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> D from BC wrote: >> > mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... >> > Time for another mega-troll. >> >> > Are Christian beliefs in conflict with good electronics engineering? >> >> There appears to be no evidence that delusion and electronics design >> ability >> are mutually exclusive. >/ >/Jim Thompson believes in the Republicans. That's pretty much the same >/level of silliness. >/ >/-- >/Bill Sloman, Nijmegen > >Republicans are right more often than Democrats. If we had the Democrats >way, Obama would be a slave, OK, bad example. > >RogerN > But still rather humorous for those of us that can see the big picture.
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 19:43 In article <1eGdncaW2629Hy_WnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.261bd98d80dd189b989729(a)209.197.12.12... > > In article <P6-dnZrBv_GGRCzWnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, > > regor(a)midwest.net says... > >> > >> "D from BC" <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in message > >> news:MPG.261b13c0a41db4f8989720(a)209.197.12.12... > >> > Are you saying that death by Spanish Inquisition, Crusades and witch > >> > hunts were ok because there's so much more death throughout history? > >> > >> Nope > >> > >> > Do you realize the reasoning you're using can be used to tone down any > >> > atrocity. > >> > > >> > >> I can't answer for what anyone else did or does, but I have seen over and > >> over Atheists blaming the majority of deaths on religion and it's simply > >> a > >> lie. So, what's the true tally? Something like deaths from Atheism 95%, > >> deaths from religion 5%? > >> > >> RogerN > > > > Is this going to make you believe atheists are evil blood thirsty > > psychopathic killers that would be happy in watching Christians suffer > > in Christian death camps using environmentally friendly solar power? > > > > Here's an interesting video with visuals of Christianity + Nazi history. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvmsieqUyOo > > > > What wars do you know of that 'Death to Christians' was the sole > > motivator for war? > > > > Nope, as usual, wrong again. Maybe you should stick to power supplies? How > bout batteries, are they too complex for you? > > RogerN Specify what is wrong.. You gave no reason and and you put a cherry on it in the form of a personal attack. You're making bullshit not reason. I'll ask again... What wars do you know of that 'Death to Christians' was the sole motivator for war? -- D from BC British Columbia
From: John Larkin on 30 Mar 2010 19:47 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: >On Mar 30, 4:12�pm, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:40:43 +1100, "David L. Jones" >> >> <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >D from BC wrote: >> >> mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... >> >> Time for another mega-troll. >> >> >> Are Christian beliefs in conflict with good electronics engineering? >> >> >There appears to be no evidence that delusion and electronics design ability >> >are mutually exclusive. >> >> >Dave. >> >> Not as long as you're happy spinning the pcb etch four or five times, >> and shipping a lot of bugs. To get it right the first time, you can't >> lie to yourself about anything. > >Your opinions about the way the genetic system might work did imply >that you were deceiving yourself pretty thorooughly in that area. Genetic science is, if anything, trending in the directions I expected. DNA and its supporting systems is indeed a very sophisticated, nearly intelligent machine, hardly a random-mutation+selection process. Evolution guarantees that it be so. John
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 20:13
In article <me25r51895gmdonabssgckmpomtf0v6div(a)4ax.com>, spam(a)spam.com says... > > You should try your question here! > > alt.religion.christian-identity But it's more interesting to get a engineer/designers point of view because electronics requires reasoning and analysis. If that same reasoning and analysis is pointed toward Christianity...then I'm curious as to what happens. Does an engineer/designer admit to irrational thinking in a field where irrational thinking is generally frowned upon? Does the belief in God, Jesus or perhaps transistor fairies diminish an engineers credibility in the skill of critical thinking? Can an engineer look good if he says, 'I have faith it won't blow up.' to board members? -- D from BC British Columbia |