Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: Hammy on 30 Mar 2010 19:32 You should try your question here! alt.religion.christian-identity
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 19:32 In article <4b15r5t8ngu6q223psvkegbb0e97k9d7qr(a)4ax.com>, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz says... > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:53:17 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > > >In article <ncu4r550btdhkjio7i8i08l84q4i9foshr(a)4ax.com>, > >jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... > >> > >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0700, D from BC > >> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <rm63r55t9mn4c33emhbu2j67i0nlr0o1db(a)4ax.com>, > >> >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:43:38 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> >So the reason why you have faith in God is because you use faith for > >> >> >other things? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Use faith? > >> >> > >> >> Yer an idiot. > >> >> > >> >> The faith is that there is a creator. All the "religions" of Earth > >> >> follow that rule. Some have more than one "god" or "creator". > >> >> > >> >> We have only ONE. > >> > > >> >Larkin claims that we commonly operate on faith. > >> >For example... > >> >He has faith his food doesn't contain E. Coli. That's because he has no > >> >evidence that his food is good or bad. But he eats his food on faith > >> >that it's safe. > >> >No evidence = faith > >> >Since faith is believing without evidence and many actions are done > >> >without evidence then faith is justified which makes God justified. > >> >If I got that right, that's his reasoning for why God exists. > >> > > >> >Sound messed up? > >> > >> I never claimed that God exists. I did claim that you're a > >> mean-spirited idiot, for which there is concrete evidence. > >> > >> John > > > >If you have faith in God? How do you stop yourself from having faith in > >every improbable thing? > > You don't read, do you. You don't elaborate, do you? -- D from BC British Columbia
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 19:35 In article <VaGdnYY4na4RHC_WnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > > OK, to be a little nicer, you don't know the process before God judged them. > For example, those in Jericho ignored God for 40 years, how long did they > need? Do you think they would have turned to God in 41 years? 42? How > many? How about never? God's not on my side, just sometimes hopefully I'm > on his side. > > RogerN Does it scare you that God is going to send you to hell if you don't believe? -- D from BC British Columbia
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 19:39 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:28:00 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:35:02 -0700, D from BC ><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > >>In article <a524r51rn73jjudigj69jkd5et7tqorrjo(a)4ax.com>, >>jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... >>> >>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:41:56 -0700, Mr.Eko >>> <ekointhedirt(a)lostisland.org> wrote: >>> >>> >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:02:57 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >>If I got this right... >>> >>The reason why you believe in God is because it works for those that >>> >>believe in God. >>> >>uhh.. That's too ambiguous for me.. >>> >>I'm understanding that as: The reason why you believe in God is because >>> >>others believe in God. >>> >>Correct? >>> > >>> > >>> > It appears that you have never had a beautiful, wonderful, early >>> >morning, early spring walk through a flowering Western US desert or >>> >Eastern US woodland. >>> > >>> > That would be a mere two of the reasons why an observer of such wonders >>> >becomes certain that it is the result of creation. >>> >>> It's not certainty to me, but it's sure suspicious that Earth is such >>> an improbably beautiful place, and that we are alive now. The >>> probability of those things happening is so close to zero that it >>> doesn't matter. >>> >>> Consider living near the triple point of water: clouds, rivers, snow, >>> all at the same time. >>> >>> Consider the neatly separated minerals for the taking, and the >>> fuel/oxidizer in abundance. Consider the clear atmosphere, dense >>> enough for flight but clear enough that we can see the stars. >>> >>> I bet D from BC is unimpressed. >>> >>> John >> >>I'm more impressed about everything because I make no claims as to what >>started the universe. I have a mystery... you don't. >> >>You claim the supernatural and the supernatural has a bad track record. > >What a doofus you are. Read my posts. I have claimed none of the >things you ascribe to me. What I am guilty of is respecting other >peoples' beliefs. > >You're an idiot and a mean-spirited churl. > >John But when I call someone stupid, it is a troll. I guess that makes you a hypocrite.
From: Mr.Eko on 30 Mar 2010 19:41
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:46:29 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Mr.Eko <ekointhedirt(a)lostisland.org> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:20:14 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:49:14 -0700, D from BC >>><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >>> >> >>>>Sure.. >>>>Do Larkin's intelligent scientists and intelligent engineers and >>>>intelligent mathematicians have an intelligent reason for why they >>>>believe the story of Jonah (that biblical guy that lived for days in a >>>>fish) or Noah or God or Jesus? >>> >>>Some do; some just have faith. >>> >>>There are lots of things that are faith-based, even if you don't >>>believe in God. Thinks like empathy, honesty, senses of fairness, >>>love, a desire to help others. Maybe you're a sociopath and don't feel >>>any of these things. Or maybe you're just an idiot. >>> >>>John >> >> >> Damn, john actually said something funny. > >Only a dim bulb would think that funny, DimBulb. No. It takes a true idiot like you to fail to see what part of his remarks held humor. |