Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 30 Mar 2010 20:35 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:32:39 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <4b15r5t8ngu6q223psvkegbb0e97k9d7qr(a)4ax.com>, >krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz says... >> >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:53:17 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <ncu4r550btdhkjio7i8i08l84q4i9foshr(a)4ax.com>, >> >jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... >> >> >> >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0700, D from BC >> >> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article <rm63r55t9mn4c33emhbu2j67i0nlr0o1db(a)4ax.com>, >> >> >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:43:38 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >So the reason why you have faith in God is because you use faith for >> >> >> >other things? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Use faith? >> >> >> >> >> >> Yer an idiot. >> >> >> >> >> >> The faith is that there is a creator. All the "religions" of Earth >> >> >> follow that rule. Some have more than one "god" or "creator". >> >> >> >> >> >> We have only ONE. >> >> > >> >> >Larkin claims that we commonly operate on faith. >> >> >For example... >> >> >He has faith his food doesn't contain E. Coli. That's because he has no >> >> >evidence that his food is good or bad. But he eats his food on faith >> >> >that it's safe. >> >> >No evidence = faith >> >> >Since faith is believing without evidence and many actions are done >> >> >without evidence then faith is justified which makes God justified. >> >> >If I got that right, that's his reasoning for why God exists. >> >> > >> >> >Sound messed up? >> >> >> >> I never claimed that God exists. I did claim that you're a >> >> mean-spirited idiot, for which there is concrete evidence. >> >> >> >> John >> > >> >If you have faith in God? How do you stop yourself from having faith in >> >every improbable thing? >> >> You don't read, do you. > >You don't elaborate, do you? You're asking John absolutely *stupid* questions based on what he *just* said. You don't read. You obviously can't think.
From: krw on 30 Mar 2010 20:36 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:41:38 -0700, Mr.Eko <ekointhedirt(a)lostisland.org> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:46:29 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Mr.Eko <ekointhedirt(a)lostisland.org> >>wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:20:14 -0700, John Larkin >>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:49:14 -0700, D from BC >>>><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>Sure.. >>>>>Do Larkin's intelligent scientists and intelligent engineers and >>>>>intelligent mathematicians have an intelligent reason for why they >>>>>believe the story of Jonah (that biblical guy that lived for days in a >>>>>fish) or Noah or God or Jesus? >>>> >>>>Some do; some just have faith. >>>> >>>>There are lots of things that are faith-based, even if you don't >>>>believe in God. Thinks like empathy, honesty, senses of fairness, >>>>love, a desire to help others. Maybe you're a sociopath and don't feel >>>>any of these things. Or maybe you're just an idiot. >>>> >>>>John >>> >>> >>> Damn, john actually said something funny. >> >>Only a dim bulb would think that funny, DimBulb. > > > No. It takes a true idiot like you to fail to see what part of his >remarks held humor. A comment on a sad sack like DfBC is not humor. You should know all about that, but you're AlwaysWrong.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 20:57 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:19:59 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >And.. > >What are your reasons as to why there's a God? > >Just following the herd? >Just believing fantastic stories in one book? >Just like the music in church? > You are worse than Rosie O'Donnell. And she is a total retard.
From: BigBalls on 30 Mar 2010 20:58 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:31:42 -0700 (PDT), brent <bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote: > My experience is the fist pass gets everyone to know what >it is they are building. Lack of engineering prowess and experience. It will come, if you strive toward it. If you stifle it, it will not.
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 21:13
In article <4a81b030-c869-4cb4-be7f-a31b9291e3a6 @j1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com says... > > > And to think, you are the evolutionary product of people who believed > like this for the last 1000 years or so, and who believed other > irrational things for another 50000 years prior to that. You must be > really proud of yourself for breaking the 50000 year old genetic > pattern you were born with. The Christian indoctrination hook of 'believe or burn' I find disturbing. It's like extortion. Brutal and criminal. How about a religion where atheists go to a nice tropical paradise when they die and across the water is another tropical paradise with the afterlife Christians. There is the option to join each paradise but it's a long boat trip. Question is: Which paradise will have the most interesting people? Where's the party at? I certainly can't imagine hanging out with Ken Hovind (in jail) or Ted Haggard (prostitution scandal). -- D from BC British Columbia |