Can Christian Electronic Designers Design?
in [Design]
|
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 19:21 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:06:55 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:25:45 -0700, D from BC ><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: > >>Goddess sounds good. >>If she's the hottest thing in the universe, I might convert and pray for >>visions. >>Bikini visions :) >>I might settle for boobies on a grill cheese. > >I sure hope you're not over 16 years old. If you are, we're seeing an >extreme case of developmental retardation. > >John "Boobies on the barbie"? Yes, he is the boob. and it wasn't developmental, the idiot did it by choice, and he has been bolstering his "stance" ever since.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 19:23 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote: >In article <rm63r55t9mn4c33emhbu2j67i0nlr0o1db(a)4ax.com>, >OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org says... >> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:43:38 -0700, D from BC <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >So the reason why you have faith in God is because you use faith for >> >other things? >> >> >> Use faith? >> >> Yer an idiot. >> >> The faith is that there is a creator. All the "religions" of Earth >> follow that rule. Some have more than one "god" or "creator". >> >> We have only ONE. > >Larkin claims that we commonly operate on faith. >For example... >He has faith his food doesn't contain E. Coli. That's because he has no >evidence that his food is good or bad. But he eats his food on faith >that it's safe. >No evidence = faith >Since faith is believing without evidence and many actions are done >without evidence then faith is justified which makes God justified. >If I got that right, that's his reasoning for why God exists. > >Sound messed up? Your bent interpretation surely does, dumbfuck.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 30 Mar 2010 19:27 On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT), brent <bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote: >On Mar 30, 7:12�am, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:40:43 +1100, "David L. Jones" >> >> <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >D from BC wrote: >> >> mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... >> >> Time for another mega-troll. >> >> >> Are Christian beliefs in conflict with good electronics engineering? >> >> >There appears to be no evidence that delusion and electronics design ability >> >are mutually exclusive. >> >> >Dave. >> >> Not as long as you're happy spinning the pcb etch four or five times, >> and shipping a lot of bugs. To get it right the first time, you can't >> lie to yourself about anything. >> >> John > >Anyone that thinks they can get any meaningful new board design done >in one pass is delusional. It depends on the design, you blatantly stupid, blanket remark dipshit. It also depends on the designer.
From: D from BC on 30 Mar 2010 19:28 In article <zcGdnXWl6bI44i_WnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, regor(a)midwest.net says... > > Dear Dipsh*t from BC > > We are being nice to you because we don't enjoy beating up idiots! Seems > you are still trying to invent the SMPS while the rest of the electronic > design world moved on beyond vacuum tube technology. OK, sorry for the > insults but it was fun while it lasted! You showed us that you are below a > preschool level of understanding about religion, so let me explain faith to > you a little bit. > > For example, if you have a doctor that you have known all your life, and you > go in for a checkup, and he says you have a problem, do you believe him? Do > you disregard what he says because he doesn't know what he's talking about, > or what? If you have known this doctor for a long time and you know him to > be reliable, you might be more likely to trust what he says. If it's your > first visit to that doctor and he says something entirely different than > what your other doctors told you, you would probably doubt what he tells > you. So, you have faith in what the trusted doctor tells you, even if you > have no symptoms, and you doubt what the other tells you, because you have > no reason to trust him. There you have it, faith in what you have known to > be trustworthy and no faith in what isn't trustworthy. You that don't know > Dr. Jesus can't break our faith in who we know and trust. You're problem is > simply that you don't know him! > > RogerN > I trust real doctors. They photograph better than Jesus. -- D from BC British Columbia
From: brent on 30 Mar 2010 19:31
On Mar 30, 6:08 pm, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT), brent > > > > <buleg...(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote: > >On Mar 30, 7:12 am, John Larkin > ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:40:43 +1100, "David L. Jones" > > >> <altz...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >D from BC wrote: > >> >> mmm sseems a little quiet in SED so... > >> >> Time for another mega-troll. > > >> >> Are Christian beliefs in conflict with good electronics engineering? > > >> >There appears to be no evidence that delusion and electronics design ability > >> >are mutually exclusive. > > >> >Dave. > > >> Not as long as you're happy spinning the pcb etch four or five times, > >> and shipping a lot of bugs. To get it right the first time, you can't > >> lie to yourself about anything. > > >> John > > >Anyone that thinks they can get any meaningful new board design done > >in one pass is delusional. > > We do it most of the time, namely ship complex designs with uPs, > FPGAs, analog stuff, power conditioning. We go from paper designs to > multilayer PC boards, formally release the rev A documentation, let > manufacturing build the first articles, and make them work. We don't > prototype and don't breadboard and usually ship rev A. > > This is a spectroscopy controller. The board on the left side of the > plate is a Kontron SBC. On the right is our board: PCI express, BGA > FPGA, BGA DRAM, fast ADC, two 128 MHz arbs, power supplies, lots of > slower analog and digital i/o. Off to the side is the operator > interface and a couple of option boards. First etch it all works. > > ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/First_Light.jpg > > Here it is packaged: > > ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/First_box.jpg > > Anyone who usually screws up the first pass is sloppy. > > John Your design looks very nice. I have had to fight the "one pass design" mentality in my business for 15 years. My experience is the fist pass gets everyone to know what it is they are building. There will be integration issues that will never be thought of ahead of the first pass. The second pass will get you close and the third pass will be required to get the boards perfect. If the project is familiar to the organization a two pass design can happen but I consider it a real victory. |