Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: rbwinn on 10 Jul 2008 06:40 On Jul 8, 8:31�pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > I go into greater depth than scientists do. �What I did, basically, is > > to take the equations they threw away, the Galilean transformation > > equations, and explained relativity of time with those equations. > > That's nice, sweetie. Now why don't you go into the living room and > watch some TV, I think your cartoons are on, m'kay? You need to find someone else to call sweetie. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 10 Jul 2008 06:41 On Jul 8, 8:45�pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > There were some atheists who said Harry Potter went on the train from > > London to wizard's school. > > And once again, child, you have confused fiction with reality... Harry Potter is fiction. The woman who wrote the books said it was fiction. I know this may come as a shock to atheists. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 10 Jul 2008 06:54 On Jul 9, 10:28�am, Ye Old One <use...(a)mcsuk.net> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 05:19:20 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > enriched this group when s/he wrote: > > > > > > >On Jul 8, 1:17�am, BuddyThunder <nos...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > >> > On Jul 6, 9:15 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > >> > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 7, 1:13 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >> >>> On Jul 6, 7:18 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > >> >>> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> >> And? > > >> >> Al- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> - Show quoted text - > > >> > Photons were invented by Einstein. �He did not visualize them that > >> > way, but that is how the Lorentz equations have them. > > >> Yes, he carved them out of purest phlogiston. Very good with his hands.. > >> What are you saying?!- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > >I am saying that before Einstein invented the idea of photons, > > He didn't. > > > there > >was a different theory of light which was called the corpuscular > >theory. > > That was abandoned long before Einstein. > > >Robert B. Winn > > Tell me coward-boy, is there ANYTHING you actually understand about > science? �No, thought not. > > -- > Bob.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Think whatever you want to think, Bob. Isaac Newton used the corpuscular theory of light. Newton's equations , using the Galilean transformation equations with absolute time, were the equations used until the Michelson-Morley experiment. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 10 Jul 2008 07:09 On Jul 9, 3:04�am, Ye Old One <use...(a)mcsuk.net> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:22:59 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> > enriched this group when s/he wrote: > > >According to scientists, > >Light emitted by any source of light travels toward the point where it > >is observed at 186,000 miles per second, regardless of the velocity of > >the source of light. > > That is correct. > > Do you have a problem with that? > > Are you aware that it has been confirmed by a large number of > experiments? > > Or is this another debate you will run away from like the coward you > are? > > -- > Bob. I never debate, Bob. I am not a lawyer. The equations thrown away by scientists were the Galilean transformation equations. x'=x-vt y'=y z'=z t'=t The Michelson-Morley experiment showed that light was traveling at c=186,000 miles per second in either frame of reference. Einstein showed this by two little equations extracted from the Lorentz equations, x=ct, x'=ct'. The second of these equations will not adapt to the Galilean transformation equations because t' is already defined to be t'=t. Consequently, time on a cesium clock in S', the moving frame of reference, has to be defined as n', a different variable. This gives us x=ct, x'=ct'. These two equations will only describe a photon traveling on the x axis in the direction of motion of x'. A photon traveling the opposite direction has a velocity of -c. So we have to use velocity of light, not speed of light. x=wt, x'=wn' x'=x-vt wn'=ct-vt n'=t(1-v/t) n', the time on a clock in S', is a slower time than t. There is no distance contraction in these equations. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 10 Jul 2008 07:12
On Jul 9, 4:51�am, "Alex W." <ing...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:912d9182-3778-4b3d-8e07-d1bb05ec37c6(a)59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 8, 4:46?am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > > Jesus told Judas at the last supper that he knew he was going to > betray �him. � He also told John that Judas was going to betray him. > > ========= > > And he acquiesced in the betrayal. > In other words, he gave Judas his blessing. No he did not give Judas his blessing. He told him that he was not going to stop him from carrying out the betrayal. Robert B. Winn |