Hackers Catch Prove Global Warming Fraud
in [Physics]
|
From: TUKA on 29 Nov 2009 01:15 On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: > Marvin the Martian wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:27:25 +0000, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>> >>> Climate Data >>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >> >> You're not grasping the concept. >> >> The e-mails show that the data's been doctored to show warming where >> there is cooling. > > For some reason, you seem to believe that all climate data has > been doctored. In reality very little, if any has been "doctored". > You have yet to show a before and after "doctored" data set. You can't -- they destroyed the raw data. > > The global data CLEARLY shows: > > Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 > http://edu-observatory.org/olli/800000yrs_CO2.png > http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm > > Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase > http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif Nope. Data destroyed. > > And accompanying Sea Level Rise > http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png > > There are many sources of good data, Marvin > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ > http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php Real Climate? Dominated by East Anglioids? And NOAA? *Neither of them will show the raw data*. And now East Anglia says the raw data was destroyed. > Marvin, you REALLY need to start taking this global climate > change seriously. Seriously! We do -- the cooking of the books is a serious crime. The perpetrators should be tried. Seriously. -- {((>:o}~ <<<<Oh look!!! An idolatrous image of the prophet!!! Surely we must now avenge this blasphemy by burning down the world!!!
From: TUKA on 29 Nov 2009 01:16 On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: > Marvin the Martian wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:30:36 +0000, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> >>> Hey Marvin--You need to start taking global climate change seriously. >> >> I do. I want to see criminal penalties for the frauds lied and said that >> it was warming when the earth was cooling. This is a trillion dollar >> scam. Perhaps put them on trial for high treason. >> >> You don't give a rip about scientific integrity nor about your country. > > For some reason, you seem to believe that all climate data has > been doctored. In reality very little, if any has been "doctored". > You have yet to show a before and after "doctored" data set. > > The global data CLEARLY shows: > > Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 > http://edu-observatory.org/olli/800000yrs_CO2.png > http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm > > Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase > http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif > > And accompanying Sea Level Rise > http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png > > There are many sources of good data, Marvin > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ > http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php Lies. They won't show the raw data. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown
From: Sam Wormley on 29 Nov 2009 01:19 TUKA wrote: > On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: >> Marvin the Martian wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:27:25 +0000, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> Climate Data >>>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >>> You're not grasping the concept. >>> >>> The e-mails show that the data's been doctored to show warming where >>> there is cooling. >> For some reason, you seem to believe that all climate data has >> been doctored. In reality very little, if any has been "doctored". >> You have yet to show a before and after "doctored" data set. > > You can't -- they destroyed the raw data. > >> The global data CLEARLY shows: >> >> Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 >> http://edu-observatory.org/olli/800000yrs_CO2.png >> http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm >> >> Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase >> http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif > > Nope. Data destroyed. > >> And accompanying Sea Level Rise >> http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png >> >> There are many sources of good data, Marvin >> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >> http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php > > Real Climate? Dominated by East Anglioids? And NOAA? > > *Neither of them will show the raw data*. And now East Anglia says the raw data > was destroyed. > >> Marvin, you REALLY need to start taking this global climate >> change seriously. Seriously! > > We do -- the cooking of the books is a serious crime. The perpetrators > should be tried. Seriously. > <laughing>
From: Sam Wormley on 29 Nov 2009 01:20 TUKA wrote: > On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: >> Marvin the Martian wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:30:36 +0000, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hey Marvin--You need to start taking global climate change seriously. >>> I do. I want to see criminal penalties for the frauds lied and said that >>> it was warming when the earth was cooling. This is a trillion dollar >>> scam. Perhaps put them on trial for high treason. >>> >>> You don't give a rip about scientific integrity nor about your country. >> For some reason, you seem to believe that all climate data has >> been doctored. In reality very little, if any has been "doctored". >> You have yet to show a before and after "doctored" data set. >> >> The global data CLEARLY shows: >> >> Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 >> http://edu-observatory.org/olli/800000yrs_CO2.png >> http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm >> >> Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase >> http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif >> >> And accompanying Sea Level Rise >> http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png >> >> There are many sources of good data, Marvin >> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >> http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php > > Lies. They won't show the raw data. > As any fool can see, you are wrong.
From: TUKA on 29 Nov 2009 01:23
On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: > TUKA wrote: >> On 2009-11-29, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)mchsi.com> wrote: >>> Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:27:25 +0000, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> Climate Data >>>>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >>>> You're not grasping the concept. >>>> >>>> The e-mails show that the data's been doctored to show warming where >>>> there is cooling. >>> For some reason, you seem to believe that all climate data has >>> been doctored. In reality very little, if any has been "doctored". >>> You have yet to show a before and after "doctored" data set. >> >> You can't -- they destroyed the raw data. >> >>> The global data CLEARLY shows: >>> >>> Human contributed increase in green house gas CO2 >>> http://edu-observatory.org/olli/800000yrs_CO2.png >>> http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/10/16/0907094106 >>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091023163513.htm >>> >>> Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase >>> http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trends.gif >> >> Nope. Data destroyed. >> >>> And accompanying Sea Level Rise >>> http://www.wildwildweather.com/forecastblog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/700px-recent_sea_level_rise.png >>> >>> There are many sources of good data, Marvin >>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/ >>> http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/index.php >> >> Real Climate? Dominated by East Anglioids? And NOAA? >> >> *Neither of them will show the raw data*. And now East Anglia says the raw data >> was destroyed. >> >>> Marvin, you REALLY need to start taking this global climate >>> change seriously. Seriously! >> >> We do -- the cooking of the books is a serious crime. The perpetrators >> should be tried. Seriously. >> > > <laughing> Any laughing going on is at you. You re claiming "the global data shows", and there is none. -- An alien from Mars would almost instantly diagnose the problem of the Palestinians from simply listening to their inane apologists: The problem is not the acquisition of the final seven percent of the West Bank denied in the offer to them at Camp David, but the pathology of a victim culture, one that has learned, through playing the card of terror with simultaneous appeals to multicultural guilt, how to shake down Westerners for their money, attention, and pity. -Victor Davis Hanson |