Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 12 Nov 2006 12:06 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ej79oe$8qk_016(a)s851.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <50e26$4555da8b$49ecfa5$6404(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>Ben Newsam wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:41:23 -0500, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The fact is that some jobs >>>>aren't worth "minimum wage". >>> >>> >>> Are you saying that you consider some jobs to be so menial that you >>> would actually pay someone less than enough to live on to do them? >>> >>> The trouble with naked capitalism is that it doesn't just produce >>> winners and wealth, it actually requires losers and poverty to >>> operate. Because otherwise there would be no incentive to do anything, >>> would there? The "pure" capitalist system actually requires that some >>> people starve to death just to make sure that the oiks get back to >>> their slave labour. >> >>Been reading too much Marx of late? >> > No, what you are seeing is how people, who have grown up > in most socialists countries, consider what "capitalism" > means. Nonsense. > I haven't been able to describe this in English ASCII > yet. Well, you could just write any old gibberish.
From: Eeyore on 12 Nov 2006 12:11 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > >> Right. There is no competition and no check on 100% corruption. > >> Most monies will go to patronage, outright stealing and administration > >> costs. None will end up buying the real service. > > > >Gee, that doesn't seem to have happened in Canada and the UK. Perhaps > >you're implying that Americans are less ethical and honest than Brits or > >Canadians? > > People are the same. How do you know similar things are not > happening in the British systems? The NHS gets audited. Besides I do actually reckon that most UK medical workers are pretty ethical ! And we have a formal 'whistleblower' system. Graham
From: T Wake on 12 Nov 2006 12:11 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ej7bje$8qk_024(a)s851.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <jhobl2tesok74154iqpoaannrd0jtn5prm(a)4ax.com>, > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: >>On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:38:41 +0000, Eeyore >><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>That roast Iraqi baby in your oven's ready for eating. >> >>--- >>Wow! >> >>Seems you've latched onto a subject you really like! > > John, this is another example of that odd behavior I've > been mentioning once in a while. Muslims teach their > young that that non-Muslims are baby eaters. No muslims that I have met do this. > And now > we see somebody using the same approach to prove > that there is no danger. Nope. Please go back and re-read it.
From: Eeyore on 12 Nov 2006 12:15 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <455629EB.431D90E1(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >And much more [NHS whistleblower policy] > > > >http://www.pcaw.co.uk/policy_pub/nhs.html > > > > That approach will work for a while until somebody, and then more > people, figure out how to use it for their own selfish concerns. > This is normal; that's how people work. Then the whistleblowing > infrastructure will need a whistleblowing system to keep it > honest. If you think that way, I can only assume it's because corruption is endemic in the USA. I find it disheartening that you think ppl are naturally thieves. Graham
From: Eeyore on 12 Nov 2006 12:16
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >> You would spend $500 on a cat operation? ($ is merely used to indicate > >> money and not type of currency). > > > >Some ppl might well do. > > I've started hearing some stories but had been dismissing them > as oddities. We all know how upsetting it is when a pet falls ill, and sometimes this can be compounded by the worry of large vets' bills. Treating a cat with a broken leg, for example, can cost around ?1,000, while cataracts for a dog could exceed ?1,500 (based on Saga claims data). http://www.saga.co.uk/finance/pet/home.html Graham |