From: krw on 15 Nov 2006 12:41 In article <455B40A5.79F0C308(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Well, Eeyore, this would belie the assertion that she lives too far from a > > > > >population center to get decent DSL. > > > > > > > > I live in a town. There is no DSL line strung. > > > > You people are starting to get really annoying. > > > > > > DSL comes down an ordinary telephone line ! > > > > Only if you're within 17K' of the CO. > > I make that just a fraction over 3 miles. I'm about four miles from the CO according to the crow. How the telco snakes things is another issue. On the line that went back to the CO I couldn't get better than about 26K. The other one went to a SLC in the neighborhood and I could get 49-53K reliably on that line. DSL was still unavailable. > It works over longer distances overr here, albeit not flat out. It falls off fast. They're not willing to even try it. -- Keith
From: T Wake on 15 Nov 2006 12:41 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ejf5gb$8qk_006(a)s792.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <cik6h.25030$TV3.8129(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:ejccvf$8ss_007(a)s858.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <4558C9E2.8C4D1D97(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >Finding the right thing that's profitable isn't always that easy. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> It is easy. People around here charge $50 for 15 minutes' worth >>>>> >> of housecleaning and they get it. >>>>> > >>>>> > They do ? >>>>> > >>>>> > I'm sure they wouldn't here. >>>>> >>>>> It's certainly not the norm in the US. It might be $50, (I've heard >>> smaller >>>>> number, in the $30 - $40 range) but it's not for 15 minutes >>>>> work--typically >>>>> it is for cleaning a whole house, which, including vacuuming, mopping, >>>>> cleaning the loo, is probably more like an hour or two. >>>> >>>>I think I detect a dismissive attitude from BAH as in she thinks it >>>>should >>> only >>>>take 15 mins to clean a house. Strange though, most women I know like to >>>>make >>> a >>>>song and dance about it. >>>> >>> >>> You people are unbelievable. I can write any ASCII line and >>> the meaning will be turned into the most politically uncorrect >>> agenda. >> >>.....says the woman who plays the gender card at any possible opportunity >>when it is to her advantage. Double standard? > > Bizarre. You play the gender card and then make a comment claiming > I did. You are getting certifiable. Do you want me to Google all the posts in this thread where you have said things like your female training makes you better than men? Every five or six posts you come up with something where you say being a woman makes you better at mess prevention (etc.) You play the gender card on a regular basis.
From: T Wake on 15 Nov 2006 12:42 "Don Bowey" <dbowey(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:C17FBDDC.4CAE5%dbowey(a)comcast.net... > On 11/14/06 3:44 PM, in article 455A54C5.408450FE(a)hotmail.com, "Eeyore" > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> T Wake wrote: >> >>> "Don Bowey" <dbowey(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What if the 20 year old person trying to live on >>>>> minimum wage needs health care. How can s/he afford it? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Many doctors will write off the cost of care for people who cannot >>>> afford >>>> to >>>> pay, and start them off with free "samples" of meds. It's rare to hear >>>> of >>>> someone who is refused the help of a doctor. On the other-hand, a Dr. >>>> doesn't have to accept a patient who is abusive or has a known habit of >>>> lieing to the Dr. >>> >>> Fair one, but the system still relies on doctors treating people "out of >>> the >>> goodness of their hearts." >> >> This used to happen in the UK too before the NHS. It wasn't considered to >> be a >> very satisfactory arrangement. >> >> Graham >> >> > Not satisfactory to whom? The post war electorate.
From: T Wake on 15 Nov 2006 12:46 "Don Bowey" <dbowey(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:C17FBF49.4CAE7%dbowey(a)comcast.net... > On 11/14/06 3:59 PM, in article > kulkl2t5du1ohjr36o1sc00lvnrkq5q64v(a)4ax.com, > "Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Nov 06 13:39:12 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> You are still assuming that there exists a GP who takes new patients. >> >> Yes. Why not? There always should be, as long as the population >> doesn't expand unexpectedly. >> >>> I ask my question again but I'll try to rephrase so that you get it. >>> >>> If no GPs are taking new patients, what do you do if you are >>> legitimately unhappy with the doctor you are assigned to. >> >> An extremely unlikely scenario. Extremely unlikely. If that were to >> happen, then you would obviously have to wait. It's never happened to >> me. > > > Then you are fortunate. Incompatibilities between doctors and patients is > not rare, and is (without prejudice) grounds for change. There must be > good > communications originated and accepted by each of them. It is relatively easy to change doctors in the UK, or see a different one regarding a particular illness. I suspect Ben meant the scenario (no GPs taking new patients) was unlikely.
From: T Wake on 15 Nov 2006 12:48
"YD" <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote in message news:l8ukl293srote1hpn3ipljupe27qggjbgl(a)4ax.com... > So, have the lot of you reached a consensus, does jihad need > scientists or not? > > - YD, just throwing some spanners in the works. You need to give it a few more weeks. There haven't been enough posts to come to an answer yet. |